Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
16. Great quote. It's the same coin though.
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 08:41 AM
Dec 2014
- Heads you lose. Tails you lose. The only logical choice is to stop using coins to run our lives.



Duality Creates Conflict

Conflict of any kind -physically, psychologically, intellectually-is a waste of energy. Please, it is extraordinarily difficult to understand and to be free of this because most of us are brought up to struggle, to make effort. When we are at school, that is the first thing that we are taught to make an effort. And that struggle, that effort is carried throughout life, that is, to be good you must struggle, you must fight evil, you must resist, control.

So, educationally, sociologically, religiously, human beings are taught to struggle. You are told that to find God you must work, discipline, do practice, twist and torture your soul, your mind, your body, deny, suppress; that you must not look; that you must fight, fight, fight at that so-called spiritual level which is not the spiritual level at all. Then, socially each one is out for himself, for his family.

So, all around, we are wasting energy. And that waste of energy in essence is conflict: the conflict between "I should" and "I should not," "I must" and "I must not." Once having created duality, conflict is inevitable. So one has to understand this whole process of duality not that there is not man and woman, green and red, light and darkness, tall and short; all those are facts. But in the effort that goes into this division between the fact and the idea, there is the waste of energy.

J. Krishnamurti, The Book of Life

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The tactic to prevent a rift in the Party is to tell Progressives and Liberals Maedhros Dec 2014 #1
Bring it on. Wellstone ruled Dec 2014 #2
Republicans should return to their own party. nt MannyGoldstein Dec 2014 #3
^^^this^^^ dflprincess Dec 2014 #13
Split the Dems = Unending GOP governments Bragi Dec 2014 #4
And the alternative -- the ONLY alternative -- is to let the GOP get everything they want FiveGoodMen Dec 2014 #8
Which only demonstrates the fact..... DeSwiss Dec 2014 #11
But, but, but if our party is divided we'll also split our votes. That would mean ... Scuba Dec 2014 #5
No thelordofhell Dec 2014 #6
I suspect if Democrats are able to nominate AtomicKitten Dec 2014 #7
Nothing will focus the Democratic Party and its base customerserviceguy Dec 2014 #9
Thanks for pulling that post together... KoKo Dec 2014 #10
If we put out "The Clintons", then we will lose. HRC has all the right wing war mongering/corporate peacebird Dec 2014 #18
I'd say there's a gaping chasm already showing. DeSwiss Dec 2014 #12
Seems their campaigns have merged by the looks of things... Segami Dec 2014 #14
Great quote. It's the same coin though. DeSwiss Dec 2014 #16
Sounds like you're ready for the streets. Eleanors38 Dec 2014 #23
And what of a 3-party system, which in fact we have, but the third party is always minimized. mother earth Dec 2014 #21
Yes, I want a say in the collapse. Eleanors38 Dec 2014 #24
There IS a HUGE split in the base of the Democratic Party. As for elected officials, not so much sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #15
But Independents swilton Dec 2014 #17
Well, that is true, Independents do have to vote for one or the other. sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #19
This is the first time I find this group, and I totally agree with what you just said. I think you mother earth Dec 2014 #20
I am not sure what it is coming. merrily Dec 2014 #22
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»Looking At The Fault Line...»Reply #16