Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
9. Well, at the very least,
Tue Sep 8, 2015, 07:27 PM
Sep 2015

it's a laundry list of people to put on ignore
I'd add even more to my list (which currently consists of almost nothing but the asshole variety of DU's atheists) but I think I'm at my list-limit. It really needs to be of unlimited capacity, considering the size of DU.

And honestly, I do believe some of DU's atheists are indeed assholes in person. Some people simply are assholes, all the time. I'm sure we all know a few like that in person. Being an AOL (Asshole OnLine, and only online) just brings more stress into life, especially with trying to keep those multiple personalities straight.

I didn't read the whole thread, just clicked on some posts by title. Even so, I read far too many making the weak assumption that faith and belief can be disassociated with ease, as you would do were another to insult your beliefs in scientific facts.

I know we've discussed a topic I brought up here about faith and belief having a direct and strong emotional attachment, and that to mock the belief is to mock the person because of that. Some didn't agree with me, yet I am still of the contention that detaching from faith and belief simply isn't easily done because one is attached through their emotions and not strictly their intellect, as with belief in provable facts.

With so many of DU's atheists continuously mistaking intellectual attachment for emotional attachment, it makes me think that two possibilities are at work here. One, they honestly don't understand the concept (which, after constantly reminding us of their intellectual superiority due to not having beliefs makes me think their intelligence isn't nearly as high as they boast.) And two, it's dismissed out of hand so that they don't have to limit their insults due to having a stronger sense of morality with other people. They'd have to give up being mean, and that's not going to happen any time soon.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why is tolerance so difficult? [View all] sarisataka Sep 2015 OP
I doubt those in the thread act that way in person. rug Sep 2015 #1
I think you are right about sarisataka Sep 2015 #2
this has been studied homogenization. captainarizona Sep 2015 #3
I saw that thread yesterday when just 4 replies TexasProgresive Sep 2015 #4
Excellent post, TP. brer cat Sep 2015 #5
As I noted in the post above brer cat Sep 2015 #6
I suspect the kind of people who get offended suffer from "ambiguity panic." phantom power Sep 2015 #7
Until I voluntarily removed myself from the Religion group Fortinbras Armstrong Sep 2015 #8
Well, at the very least, kentauros Sep 2015 #9
Nail on the head Starboard Tack Sep 2015 #10
Thank you :) kentauros Sep 2015 #11
Starboard Tack gelatinous cube Dec 2015 #14
Tolerance is only of value if you are open to the possibility you might be wrong el_bryanto Sep 2015 #12
I've been called a "coward" thucythucy Nov 2015 #13
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Interfaith Group»Why is tolerance so diffi...»Reply #9