Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Philosophy

Showing Original Post only (View all)

PosterChild

(1,307 posts)
Mon May 5, 2014, 09:12 PM May 2014

Does this even start to make sense? [View all]

From a book review of The Tyranny of Experts: Economists, Dictators, and the Forgotten Rights of the Poor:

According the Easterly [the author], Adam Smith's notion of the invisible hand - the natural flow of the democratic process, the will of the people, the power to make a government accountable for its actions, the right to redress grievances - is as potent a motivator in poor communities as it is in rich ones.


This seems to be a massive misunderstanding of Adam Smith's notion of the invisible hand - That from a mired individual selfish acts emerges an over-all condition conducive to the general welfare, and that this occurs without the "visible hand" of explicit political agency - without the power to make the government accountable, without the right to redress grievances, without political will of the people or anyone else, outside of and without the democratic, or any other, political process.

Now I admit that I have not read The Wealth of Nations or Smith's Theory of Moral Sentiments - but I have read about his theories and thoughts and I just cannot reconcile what I know with the claim made by the author - or perhaps imposed on the author by a careless reviewer.

Am I right about this? Could any characterization of Smith's invisible hand be more wrong? Or have I missed something?
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does this even start to make sense? [View all] PosterChild May 2014 OP
I don't think you missed anything-- that quote makes no sense. TreasonousBastard May 2014 #1
Thanks! (nt) PosterChild May 2014 #3
Yep, whoever wrote that does not understand Smith Fortinbras Armstrong May 2014 #2
Thanks! (nt) PosterChild May 2014 #4
Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2014 #5
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Philosophy»Does this even start to m...»Reply #0