Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Philosophy

In reply to the discussion: My first impression... [View all]

Kali

(56,328 posts)
3. thanks for posting this
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 10:44 PM
Apr 2013

I am not knowledgeable about philosophy at all, so maybe this isn't the right place to write this, but I sure as hell wasn't going to post it in that thread.

I have conflict about horrible crimes too. I guess my problem is comprehending what we are trying to do with the perpetrators. Is it all about punishment? Are there other possibilities or considerations that we have or should have? Certainly isolating or eliminating someone like this has the benefit to others that they can't harm anyone else. That would be something I could get behind as a rational for either life or death sentences. If is to punish, what is adequate - or should torture and other extreme treatments be allowed too? Is there any motivation to try for redemption (not just this kind of horrendous crime but also in general)?

In other words what is the goal for convicting people?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Philosophy»My first impression...»Reply #3