Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jimmy the one

(2,769 posts)
9. politifact fact checked it
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 01:01 PM
Mar 2015

This was rated MOSTLY FALSE: Says "President Obama is using executive actions to impose gun control on the nation, targeting the top-selling rifle in the country ... with a ban on one of the most-used" assault rifle bullets. — Paul Bedard - wapo reporter http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/mar/04/paul-bedard/columnist-obama-presses-gun-control-t/

(politifact): ...{bedard's} talking about the ATF’s plan for one particular type of bullet -- a 5.56 mm "green tip." It is found in SS109 and M855 cartridges, and it’s one of the more popular types of ammunition in America, experts told us. But this February, the ATF announced a proposal to remove an exemption that allowed gun owners to use this particular kind of ammunition. The agency’s reasoning? It can pierce the sort of body armor often worn by police, and it can be fired from a handgun.
The ammunition isn’t new, nor is its ability to pierce body armor. What is new is that gun manufacturers are making handguns that use a 5.56 mm "green tip."
That, ATF says, violates the Law Enforcement Officers Protection Act of 1985 that aimed to ban armor piercing bullets.
"The AR-based handguns and rifles utilize the same magazines and share identical receivers," the ATF wrote.. "These AR-type handguns were not commercially available when the armor piercing ammunition exemption was granted in 1986. To ensure consistency, upon final implementation of the sporting purpose framework outlined above, ATF must withdraw the exemptions for 5.56 mm "green tip" ammunition, including both the SS109 and M855 cartridges."


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I have to be contrary on this one KellyW Mar 2015 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author billh58 Mar 2015 #2
Why don't we ban the manufacture of pistols that fire rifle cartridges? indie9197 Mar 2015 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author billh58 Mar 2015 #4
Profits on M855 green tip ammo is up 40% KellyW Mar 2015 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author billh58 Mar 2015 #7
handguns shooting AR15 bullets, problems therein jimmy the one Mar 2015 #8
The *entire* problem is repeating handguns shooting rifle ammo, period. They should be NFA'ed. sir pball Mar 2015 #10
This ammunition is totally useless. flamin lib Mar 2015 #6
politifact fact checked it jimmy the one Mar 2015 #9
The ATF is suspending the proposal Amishman Mar 2015 #11
suspended, fear of rabies jimmy the one Mar 2015 #20
Just as a matter of fact, banning this bullet would do nothing... Adrahil Mar 2015 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author billh58 Mar 2015 #13
There is no need to be rude. Adrahil Mar 2015 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author billh58 Mar 2015 #15
Then you will continue to fail. Adrahil Mar 2015 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author billh58 Mar 2015 #17
Insult, Insult, Insult. What a pleasant person you are. Adrahil Mar 2015 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author billh58 Mar 2015 #19
If you are going to define all gun owners as the enemy.... Adrahil Mar 2015 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author billh58 Mar 2015 #22
Yes it is frustrating that some don’t want to have any discussion of tactics KellyW Mar 2015 #23
Bill, could you please put Adrahil on your ignore list? They haven't done anything worth blocking Electric Monk Mar 2015 #24
Restrictions based on the actual cartridge the "handgun" fires would be better IMO.. sir pball Mar 2015 #25
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»This message was self-del...»Reply #9