Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BainsBane

(56,274 posts)
23. Bad news
Tue Mar 19, 2013, 11:14 PM
Mar 2013

The new bill will extend to gun shows but not private sales.


"The farthest-reaching gun control bill in the Minnesota House, which would have expanded background checks to nearly all firearm sales, has been greatly diminished, instead expanding checks to include all purchases at gun shows but not including other private gun sales or transfers.

The House Public Safety and Finance Committee was scheduled to vote on the bill Tuesday, March 19. But chairman and bill sponsor Rep. Michael Paymar, DFL-St. Paul, pulled it about 8:15 p.m., after a nearly nine-hour recess.

Paymar said after the meeting that his bill was dead and he is trying to push an alternative proposal that extends background checks to just gun shows.

Paymar has enough votes to get the watered-down version out of his committee."


http://www.twincities.com/minnesota/ci_22821997/minnesota-house-panel-takes-up-background-checks-guns

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Minnesota Action Alert! [View all] Robb Mar 2013 OP
Edit: see Minneapolis Star Tribune article below BainsBane Mar 2013 #1
More info from the Star-Tribune BainsBane Mar 2013 #2
There are strange divisions between the bills sarisataka Mar 2013 #3
Paymar's bill is the most comprehensive BainsBane Mar 2013 #4
You would like to see a toothless non-UBC bill become law? rdharma Mar 2013 #6
I believe I clearly stated sarisataka Mar 2013 #10
You prefer the one with UBC. rdharma Mar 2013 #13
Watching the news I found one issue with Paymar's bill sarisataka Mar 2013 #14
probably because of opposition from hunters BainsBane Mar 2013 #15
A fair amount of guns are traded pipoman Mar 2013 #21
UBC only applies to handguns and military style rifles rdharma Mar 2013 #16
That's how it is worded sarisataka Mar 2013 #18
Good point. Agreed, UBC should be 'universal' in types of weapons covered. freshwest Mar 2013 #20
Sorry for doubting you, sarisataka......... rdharma Mar 2013 #27
Nothing to forgive sarisataka Mar 2013 #28
Yes, and here it is BainsBane Mar 2013 #19
I called all of the committee members BainsBane Mar 2013 #5
Paymar's Bill is the only meaningful bill. rdharma Mar 2013 #7
that was my concern BainsBane Mar 2013 #8
Are these MN committee votes carried live....... rdharma Mar 2013 #9
via the internet BainsBane Mar 2013 #11
House Public Safety Finance & Policy Committe Live Feed 7pm CTZ rdharma Mar 2013 #12
My guess is that section 14.7a will have the most resistance. ManiacJoe Mar 2013 #17
Adjourned without a vote, rescheduled for Thursday. nt Robb Mar 2013 #22
Bad news BainsBane Mar 2013 #23
Completely worthless! rdharma Mar 2013 #24
It didn't come up for a vote BainsBane Mar 2013 #25
Political Calculation? rdharma Mar 2013 #26
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»Minnesota Action Alert!»Reply #23