Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BainsBane

(56,368 posts)
2. More info from the Star-Tribune
Tue Mar 19, 2013, 02:17 PM
Mar 2013
The House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee discussed the bill, sponsored by the chairman, Rep. Michael Paymar, DFL-St. Paul, but recessed until 7 p.m. for a final vote.
Opponents said the bill was delayed because Paymar does not have the votes to pass it. Paymar admitted that the vote is close, and that he may try to change the bill before the night meeting in order to win passage.
Rep. Tony Cornish, R-Vernon Center, chief opponent of the bill on the committee, said all GOP members and two DFLers oppose it. He said the delay was engineered to put pressure on the Democrats to approve the bill.
One of the DFL opponents is Rep. Debra Hilstrom, DFL-Brooklyn Center, an Anoka County prosecutor whose district is mixed on the issue but who has never been highly rated by the NRA. She has sponsored a rival bill that the NRA supports, which focuses on blocking straw purchases of guns by intermediaries and punishing felons who illegally possess weapons.


http://www.startribune.com/politics/blogs/199000631.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Minnesota Action Alert! [View all] Robb Mar 2013 OP
Edit: see Minneapolis Star Tribune article below BainsBane Mar 2013 #1
More info from the Star-Tribune BainsBane Mar 2013 #2
There are strange divisions between the bills sarisataka Mar 2013 #3
Paymar's bill is the most comprehensive BainsBane Mar 2013 #4
You would like to see a toothless non-UBC bill become law? rdharma Mar 2013 #6
I believe I clearly stated sarisataka Mar 2013 #10
You prefer the one with UBC. rdharma Mar 2013 #13
Watching the news I found one issue with Paymar's bill sarisataka Mar 2013 #14
probably because of opposition from hunters BainsBane Mar 2013 #15
A fair amount of guns are traded pipoman Mar 2013 #21
UBC only applies to handguns and military style rifles rdharma Mar 2013 #16
That's how it is worded sarisataka Mar 2013 #18
Good point. Agreed, UBC should be 'universal' in types of weapons covered. freshwest Mar 2013 #20
Sorry for doubting you, sarisataka......... rdharma Mar 2013 #27
Nothing to forgive sarisataka Mar 2013 #28
Yes, and here it is BainsBane Mar 2013 #19
I called all of the committee members BainsBane Mar 2013 #5
Paymar's Bill is the only meaningful bill. rdharma Mar 2013 #7
that was my concern BainsBane Mar 2013 #8
Are these MN committee votes carried live....... rdharma Mar 2013 #9
via the internet BainsBane Mar 2013 #11
House Public Safety Finance & Policy Committe Live Feed 7pm CTZ rdharma Mar 2013 #12
My guess is that section 14.7a will have the most resistance. ManiacJoe Mar 2013 #17
Adjourned without a vote, rescheduled for Thursday. nt Robb Mar 2013 #22
Bad news BainsBane Mar 2013 #23
Completely worthless! rdharma Mar 2013 #24
It didn't come up for a vote BainsBane Mar 2013 #25
Political Calculation? rdharma Mar 2013 #26
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»Minnesota Action Alert!»Reply #2