Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

customerserviceguy

(25,240 posts)
12. And 50 is ridiculous
Fri Mar 22, 2013, 07:19 AM
Mar 2013

All I'm advocating is that those who do the most physically stressful work should be allowed full benefits at 65, as it was for years, and that we pay for that by not allowing full benefits for those who do not have physically demanding jobs, who can do them for more years. As we transistion to a society where the burdens of work get lighter because of technology, we naturally raise the retirement age.

We don't live in the world of 1935 when the Social Security rules were first put in place, we live in a place where people live longer and more productive lives, where backbreaking labor is the exception rather than the norm. Shouldn't our policies for retirement plans reflect that just a little bit?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Social Security & Medicare»The Social Security retir...»Reply #12