Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Joe Shlabotnik

(5,604 posts)
1. Look forward to reading the rest of the series,
Thu Dec 12, 2013, 05:33 PM
Dec 2013

Andrew Gavin Marshall writes some good stuff. For context, from the first 2 parts of the series:

This institution, though not widely discussed, is enormously influential. And here's why.

The history of the Group of Thirty goes back to the Rockefeller Foundation, which provided the organization's initial funding. In its 1978 annual report, the Rockefeller Foundation – which represents the interests of highly centralized corporate and financial power – recalled that it was created in 1913 as a response to “the Populist assault on the massive concentration of wealth in the hands of few.”
http://www.occupy.com/article/global-power-project-group-thirty-and-good-discussion-theyre-still-having

...In other words, for the Group of Thirty, they don’t produce mere "recommendations," but rather "instructions" which they expect to be followed. It is of significance that many of those who produced the report and who are members of the G30 conveniently hold an official position so as to be able to dutifully implement those instructions.

The report noted some “ideal candidates” to manage long-term financing, such as pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, insurance companies, endowments and foundations. By the end of 2010, these institutions had roughly $57 trillion in assets, a number which the G30 predicted would increase by $3 trillion per year until 2020.

Noting that the world’s major economies would be continuing to undergo austerity measures – or "fiscal consolidation" programs – over the “medium-term,” the ability of governments to make investments would be heavily restrained. Thus, “the private sector will need to be mobilized to fill the gap.” In other words, so-called "public-private partnerships" become the route to go, to ensure that corporations and banks reap massive profits, subsidized by governments.
http://www.occupy.com/article/global-power-project-group-thirty-and-its-methods-financial-governance

Usurp democratically elected power by dismantling a government's ability to raise taxes, or regulate markets in any way. Starve the citizens through austerity. Create dependency while integrating the 1% 'benefactor class' as the only possible solution. Sell it to the public as cheap goods, and economic wisdom (Thatcher's T.I.N.A.)

Perhaps ancient-alien-lizard-people-banking-Illuminati are not that far fetched after all.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Occupy Underground»Global Power Project: The...»Reply #1