Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
10. Especially when the hacked emails don't really have much content of interest
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 01:03 PM
Jan 2017

I'd take your question a step further: why does the fact that emails are hacked and leaked become a story about the victim, redounding negatively onto them, even when there's nothing very damning contained in them?

I agree with those who say it's about a headline. And somehow, getting hacked casts some weird shadow on the hackee, not the hacker. It's as if people's thinking process is: if that person or institution got hacked, there's something in there they wanted to hide. Don't know what it is, but it must be bad.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why is hacked material so...»Reply #10