Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

ucrdem

(15,720 posts)

1. That's well and good, but as it was used in the 2016 Dem primaries, "economic justice"

Reply to Garrett78 (Original post)

Thu Dec 29, 2016, 05:54 AM

Dec 2016

meant among other things:

1) sending Jamie Dimon to prison along with unnamed fellow finance sector perps;
2) bashing Barack for not doing #1;
3) bashing Hillary for colluding in #2, also for accepting speaking fees from Jamie Dimon;
4) bashing the TPP which means bashing Barack, Hillary, and Bill;
5) bashing NAFTA which means #4;

and of course,

6) have you accepted not-Hillary as your personal lord and savior?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Social justice encompasses economic justice." [View all] Garrett78 Dec 2016 OP

That's well and good, but as it was used in the 2016 Dem primaries, "economic justice" ucrdem Dec 2016 #1

OK, you see most of those things as "bashing Barack, Hillary and Bill". Ken Burch Jan 2017 #9

The sad thing is that the Democratic Establishment accepted NAFTA was a failure for workers forjusticethunders Dec 2016 #2

THat was my interpretation of the TPP as I read more on it... JHan Jan 2017 #11

Not quite zipplewrath Jan 2017 #13

Social justice doesn't encompass economic justice under our current economic system. jalan48 Dec 2016 #3

I think historically they have that kind of backwards mythology Dec 2016 #4

There isn't anything backward or forward about it. It isn't a matter of chronology. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #5

Social justice will not be back burnered and wait for white men to have enough first. bettyellen Dec 2016 #8

The Civil Rights movement started long before the late 40s and 50s forjusticethunders Jan 2017 #10

Not directly zipplewrath Jan 2017 #14

And vice-versa, whatever that means. Orsino Dec 2016 #6

Not vice-versa if you go by the definitions in the OP. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #7

One thing is true, there is no economic justice without important components of social justice, JCanete Jan 2017 #12