Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

uponit7771

(93,175 posts)

11. Unnnn, I think in every state they've fought... if you're talking about a campaign issue then

Reply to JCanete (Reply #10)

Tue Dec 27, 2016, 01:12 PM

Dec 2016

... you're 100% right.

They can make it an issue with showing mostly the white middle class being affected if their concerned about "identity" issues.

That's the reason why I think Deans proposal is correct; the DNC head should be full time... period

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If this election was free and fair then of course someone else could've won it [View all] uponit7771 Dec 2016 OP

"Eeees OK," says Vladimir. tenorly Dec 2016 #1

Someone said Russia and Comey and Voter suppression was nothing new in response to free... uponit7771 Dec 2016 #2

It's amazing how quickly the abnormal can get normalized, even among smart people. tenorly Dec 2016 #3

+1 uponit7771 Dec 2016 #6

If it had been free and fair it could be audited and recounted... Orsino Dec 2016 #4

exactly. nt LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #5

yes uponit7771 Dec 2016 #7

There's the issue that there is no evidence that the actual voting wasn't free mythology Dec 2016 #8

Yes there is, Nate silver not only calculated the 1.2% effect of voter suppression but also the uponit7771 Dec 2016 #9

yet Democrats have failed time and time again to make voter suppression and voter machines a major JCanete Dec 2016 #10

Unnnn, I think in every state they've fought... if you're talking about a campaign issue then uponit7771 Dec 2016 #11

yes, that's what I mean. Fighting at the state level is by itself, likely to be a losing battle. JCanete Dec 2016 #12

+1, I think some of the consensus now is to do some scale tipping ourselves in the most moral uponit7771 Dec 2016 #13

I think that sounds pretty sensible. Places where it has a provable outcome are probably a smart JCanete Dec 2016 #14

+1 uponit7771 Dec 2016 #15