Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)

6. It makes sense because the vast majority of "independents" are partisan.

Reply to Madam45for2923 (Original post)

Thu Dec 22, 2016, 01:18 AM

Dec 2016

And non-affiliated women are going to be more Dem-friendly than non-affiliated men, as is true among those who are party-affiliated.

Racism and sexism are alive and well, sadly.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary won Independent Women ! Independent men? Not so much, They went for Trump [View all] Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 OP

Kicking! Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #1

If we're looking at exit polls, look at Clinton 2016 vs Obama 2012 portlander23 Dec 2016 #2

For the last time, the exit polls clearly got Latino voters wrong. StevieM Dec 2016 #4

And gays dsc Dec 2016 #5

+1 uponit7771 Dec 2016 #11

Obama 2008 outperformed Obama 2012 also JI7 Dec 2016 #7

More and more evidence of misogyny in our socially backward nation. nt oasis Dec 2016 #3

It makes sense because the vast majority of "independents" are partisan. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #6

Mahalo for this, Madam.. I wish I had seen it Cha Dec 2016 #8

Thanks Cha! Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #9

KICK! Cha Dec 2016 #10

Kicking! Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #12

"Independent" men voted for the least independent man in modern hostory. Orsino Dec 2016 #13

Because Independents AKA Unaffiliated are seriously clueless otohara Dec 2016 #14