Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PatsFan87

(368 posts)
1. As a progressive Bernie supporter who voted for Hillary in the general election...
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 04:37 PM
Dec 2016

I think we need to take optics into account. Obama isn't going to be in office anymore. The Clintons will be away from politics as well. So who are the Republicans going to tie Democratic house and senate candidates to? Nancy Pelosi, a wealthy, establishment figure representing a wealthy, liberal San Francisco district. The attack ads in rural, middle America districts practically write themselves. Would these Democratic house candidates get attacked by Republicans trying to compare them to Tim Ryan, an Ohio representative- representing a struggling area- who took on the establishment? Doubtful. Republicans don't win because they're on the right side of policy. They win because they're smarter with their attacks and they know how to play the game. Democrats don't have many efficient attack dogs, they fold too easily, and they don't know how to play the game. We won't find our way back if we can't take back the house (and we have been hemorrhaging seats the last handful of years.) Time to reflect and change.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

As a progressive Bernie supporter who voted for Hillary in the general election... PatsFan87 Dec 2016 #1
There's truth to your post realmirage Dec 2016 #11
Totally agree. Maybe because Pelosi is a woman? Justice Dec 2016 #2
Same reason why Shaun King thinks Booker is an "alternative" forjusticethunders Dec 2016 #3
when shaun king talks about race he is interesting La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #4
yeah pretty much forjusticethunders Dec 2016 #5
Yep. But I still like him lots.. JHan Dec 2016 #10
you talking about booker? I like Corey a lot too. La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #12
Yep Corey.... JHan Dec 2016 #13
Everyone prioritizes different issues though forjusticethunders Dec 2016 #15
perfectly reasonable position La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #16
I am inclined to beleive these are the same people that touted Tulsi Gabbard as a progressive hero etherealtruth Dec 2016 #6
omg dont even get me started on gabbard La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #7
beleive me ... I know :-( etherealtruth Dec 2016 #8
Gabbard is automatically deemed 'progressive' emulatorloo Dec 2016 #9
As it happened, there wasn't much support for dumping Pelosi Ken Burch Dec 2016 #14
I think a lot of people are reconsidering the antagonism felt towards Blue Dogs now that we see geek tragedy Dec 2016 #17
Remember when people wanted Jim Webb to run for President ? JI7 Dec 2016 #18
i knew about his position on abortion but i didn't know about the NRA thing. because it looks like JI7 Dec 2016 #19
Seems to me it would better sense to throw out the left fringe-ers. Lil Missy Dec 2016 #20
We cannot have a 50-state strategy without being a Big Tent. Willie Pep Dec 2016 #21
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I truly don't understand ...»Reply #1