2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: 538: Voters really did switch to Trump at the last minute [View all]Hassin Bin Sober
(27,156 posts)... the Clinton margin could disappear with a slight polling mistake. Silver warned it wasn't in the bag.
'Fuck Nate Silver, he just wants a horse race!!! Sam Wang has it at 99%'
Or words to that effect.
I think too many people got caught up with the big 65/35 number on Clinton's side and confused it with a polling number when it was really "odds" or chances of winning.
I think he even said something about the numbers being great odds for betting on a game but not so much when the fate of our country is at stake.
What really hit home was he gave Trump the same Chance as the Cubs winning the series. *gulp*
Like everybody else, I got caught up with the "in the bag" feelings. But when I read Silver's warnings and I started looking at the margins in the battleground states, I got that sinking feeling I had in 2004. About a week before the 2004 election, I read about all the anti gay marriage legislation the repigs put on the ballots around the country and I thought "uh oh"
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):