Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MrPurple

(985 posts)
1. The Dems should have addressed this when they had the supermajorities in 2009
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 11:31 AM
Dec 2016

This gamesmanship/lack of transparency seems impossible to address now, but I would have liked to see the Democrats do something about requiring paper ballots, setting up national standards when Obama came into office with the supermajorities.

It could have been sold to the public and would have been tough to oppose a genuine effort to make the process more transparent, maybe establish national standards for requiring random recounts in all states and all paper ballots. After the Florida butterfly ballot fiasco in 2000 and questions about manipulations against Kerry in Ohio in 2004, they should have taken the opportunity to do something about it.

If there are electronic machines with no paper backup, people will hack them, that's guaranteed. In the old days with Tammany Hall & Mayor Daley's Chicago, the Democrats were probably the best at manipulating votes, but this seems to be a Republican game now. There needs to be a national standard where the system can't be leaned on in the ways it is.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Recounts Are Only as Good...»Reply #1