Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

earthside

(6,960 posts)
4. Exactly the opposite.
Sat Dec 17, 2016, 11:23 PM
Dec 2016

A Democratic strong economic populist woman would have won Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and probably even Florida.

Hillary Clinton carried 30 years of political baggage with her ... fairly or not, is was there. The polls showed it from the moment she announced: people didn't trust her and they didn't like her.

I strongly believe that an Elizabeth Warren or Amy Klobachar or Patty Murray with a strong message would have defeated any Republican nominee.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Considering that Republicans lie and make up all sorts of shit rurallib Dec 2016 #1
I believe it is deeper than that, I had one 60+ told me they don't CK_John Dec 2016 #3
Considering she won the popular vote by such a margin, I can't agree. WheelWalker Dec 2016 #2
Exactly the opposite. earthside Dec 2016 #4
No the polls didn't show it from the moment she announced Buzz cook Dec 2016 #5
There's no doubt Clinton hate is strong, and has been for decades. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #6
So she was over qualified and Palin was under qualified, and a jerk like Perry ends CK_John Dec 2016 #7
No way she would have won if not for the two year witch hunt in Congress and on Fox news, doc03 Dec 2016 #8
no doubt a lot of men went into the voting booth and could not vote for a woman for POTUS, TheFrenchRazor Dec 2016 #9
Hillary won the popular vote by 3 million.other countries have female presidents so can't be that. Sunlei Dec 2016 #10
You are about a Century behind the rest of us. n/t Lil Missy Dec 2016 #11
Well for having only gotten the vote in 1920 and 60% of eligible voter didn't vote, 2020 might CK_John Dec 2016 #12
Yeah, right. Coyotl Dec 2016 #13
No, she won, her campaign team f***ed this up... Yurovsky Dec 2016 #14
Peter theil certainly thinks we were better off before women could vote La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #15
Ann Coulter: Women Should Not Have The Right To Vote, But They Can Still Write Books CK_John Dec 2016 #16
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»IMO, no female would have...»Reply #4