Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unblock

(55,414 posts)
3. she did absolutely nothing wrong. in a sane universe, the only consequence would be
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 12:33 AM
Dec 2016

that her system administrator would get a warning for not having kept up with the latest microsoft security updates.

in a sane world, the idea that she should be prosecuted or even politically faulted for what she did would be completely laughable.

having worked in a secure environment, i can guarantee you that if hillary belongs in jail for what she did, so would at least half of all people who ever held security clearance. the biggest culprit is not following the "need to know" part. it's not enough to have the right clearance level, you also have to have a "need to know". but a lot of people with clearances get frustrated that they can't talk about things outside work, so they take liberties at work with colleagues they know have the appropriate clearances, though not the "need to know".

this sort of thing gets a warning at worse (although repeated warnings can have further consequences).

hillary didn't even do that.

the whole thing was absolutely ridiculous if you took it at face value. of course, that's just the thing, her inquisitors knew it was all a big joke. the point was simply to smear her and pretend that what she did was somehow far more nefarious than it actually was.

and given the further joke that is our media, it worked.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

95% true triron Dec 2016 #1
You might want to read what the Clinton campaign insiders thought about the issue... PoliticAverse Dec 2016 #2
They were fully aware of how the media would treat anything triron Dec 2016 #4
Right. baldguy Dec 2016 #5
I pretty sure the Japanese attack was not a 'non problem' that became a problem by a bad PR strategy PoliticAverse Dec 2016 #6
But nobody except those enamored with extremist RW conspiracy theories blamed FDR. baldguy Dec 2016 #9
You're confusing the Clinton email issue with the DNC hacking issue. n/t PoliticAverse Dec 2016 #12
Oh, yeah. Gucifer and Gucifer 2.0 had the exact same targets, the exact same objectives, baldguy Dec 2016 #13
Except for the fact that if Clinton hadn't used a private email server, the FBI wouldn't mythology Dec 2016 #10
There you go, pretending America wasn't attacked, and blaming Clinton for being the crime victim. baldguy Dec 2016 #11
You keep confusing Clinton's private server while SOS with the Russian DNC hacks. Ace Rothstein Dec 2016 #24
she did absolutely nothing wrong. in a sane universe, the only consequence would be unblock Dec 2016 #3
yeah, so msnbc hands the mic to the guy who says he would have mopinko Dec 2016 #8
So true, incompetent colluders ... pbmus Dec 2016 #7
It was an attack by the VRWC on Hillary ucrdem Dec 2016 #14
+1000 Hekate Dec 2016 #17
She didn't, and Comey personally went before Congress to break it to them. ucrdem Dec 2016 #15
snrk Hekate Dec 2016 #18
Computer Security Is The Sole Responsibility Of The IT Person DallasNE Dec 2016 #16
k n r. nt LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #19
Woah...so Russia put that server in her basement... TCJ70 Dec 2016 #20
the irony is her homebrew server was protected from hacking more than most servers Fast Walker 52 Dec 2016 #21
Some "liberals" will spend endless time desperatly searching for some reason to hate Clinton. baldguy Dec 2016 #22
yep, it really sucked this election. Fast Walker 52 Dec 2016 #23
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Just to clarify for every...»Reply #3