Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Youth vote 2008: 66% for Obama / Youth vote 2016 55% for Hillary [View all]spooky3
(37,770 posts)26. But his margin in 2012 narrowed despite his being young, cool, etc. A YUGE factor in 2008
that differed from 2016 was that the economy was in horrible shape and getting worse.
A second factor was that Obama was in the opposition party to that of the White House. In 2016, Clinton was running as a member of the same party as a two term incumbent. According to Lichtman (the political scientist whose model predicted a Trump win this year), history shows that that factor historically predicts election outcomes (independent of other factors).
"Inspiring" is a very subjective factor and Clinton was certainly "inspiring" in many ways to women and other groups.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Youth vote 2008: 66% for Obama / Youth vote 2016 55% for Hillary [View all]
Jean-Jacques Roussea
Dec 2016
OP
I saw a round table discussion with a group of first graders concernig the candidates.
lapucelle
Dec 2016
#23
Sanders would've broke a hip, but Hillary could've really done to invoke those "identity politics"
Jean-Jacques Roussea
Dec 2016
#17
But his margin in 2012 narrowed despite his being young, cool, etc. A YUGE factor in 2008
spooky3
Dec 2016
#26