2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: The fringe left problem [View all]Crunchy Frog
(27,719 posts)don't you? I'm not saying that all of them did, but a sizeable chunk. Remember the PUMAS? Obama was a good enough candidate and campaigner that he still won handily, in spite of their negativity, lack of support, and lack of votes (even some of them voting for the Repugs). I don't think that this is a left/right/center thing. I think it's just bad blood over one's preferred candidate not being handed the nomination on a silver platter.
With a really good candidate (Obama) a strong primary challenge will only make them better.
If the party decides to veer sharply to the right with the next candidate, there will be a loss of some liberal and leftist voters. Their best bet is to accept that political reality, and incorporate it into the campaign calculations, or we can expect to lose again.
You'll never win by simply acting like you're entitled to everyone's vote. Obama certainly didn't.
Disclaimer: I was neutral during the primaries. Post election, I think I'm retroactively gravitating towards the Bernie Sanders camp.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):