2016 Postmortem

MichMary

(1,714 posts)

2. Um, no.

Tue Dec 13, 2016, 03:54 PM

Dec 2016

The explanation I read is that when the optical scanners jammed and the ballots had to be put through again, the poll workers weren't resetting the machines, as they were supposed to.

Considering that this was in heavily-Democratic Detroit, there is a pretty good chance that those duplicate votes (or at least the vast majority of them) were for Clinton.

Besides, good chance the poll workers there were Democrats. Do you think they would be stuffing the ballot boxes for Trump? Do you think those poll workers would let in people in carrying stacks of ballots to put through the machine.

This is nonsense.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How to steal an election by hiding votes in plain sight [View all] philosslayer Dec 2016 OP

Something else at work here. Wellstone ruled Dec 2016 #1

Um, no. MichMary Dec 2016 #2

you underestimate the maggots people MFM008 Dec 2016 #3

How do you know a "poll worker is a Democrat"? philosslayer Dec 2016 #4

Because it's Detroit? MichMary Dec 2016 #5

You have got to be kidding me philosslayer Dec 2016 #6

I didn't say "everyone" MichMary Dec 2016 #9

93.96% Detroit voters cast votes for liberal candidates in 2004 MichMary Dec 2016 #11

detroit was a sea of foreclosed homes, city abandoned to RW 'management', empty homes rotting away Sunlei Dec 2016 #15

really? wow. nt LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #7

wow uponit7771 Dec 2016 #10

are you a troll or just clueless? nt TheFrenchRazor Dec 2016 #14

K&R red dog 1 Dec 2016 #8

So much wrong with this post SickOfTheOnePct Dec 2016 #12

No voting machine tampering? No election tampering? RealityChik Dec 2016 #16

because 90,000 left ballots blank? "registered more ballots than the number of votes tallied" Sunlei Dec 2016 #13