2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: How we regarded election fraud and systemic bias in the primary [View all]CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts).... Which reads as follows:
I saw on another post that Putin was retaliating against Clinton because he thought she had interfered in his election in 2011. So much blame to go around and it seems to be growing and never ending.
And you apparently can't understand why I might comment on on your statement (above) by saying, "You seem to be insinuating that Putin was justified when he had is people work against Hillary the general election because he thought 'he had interfered in his election in 2011". 'So much blame to go around"?
Apparently you either were insinuating that Hillary brought the Russians hacks on herself or you have trouble understanding how other people will react to your posts. Either way you need to think before you post.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):