Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Jean-Jacques Roussea

(475 posts)

4. They've confused "investigation" with "witch hunt"

Reply to TheBlackAdder (Original post)

Sat Dec 10, 2016, 11:23 AM

Dec 2016

investigations are not mob executions. Understandable given that they're only familiar with the inquisition-lite types of "investigating" that they put Hillary through for the last year.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

FOX NEWS Poll: Should the U.S. investigate allegations of Russian interference in the election? [View all] TheBlackAdder Dec 2016 OP

"No, there is not enough evidence" is not a real choice randr Dec 2016 #1

link to poll: annabanana Dec 2016 #2

Did they have enough evidence when the charged Hillary for Bengazi and Auntie Bush Dec 2016 #3

They've confused "investigation" with "witch hunt" Jean-Jacques Roussea Dec 2016 #4

They only care about stolen elections if they think their candidate might lose. Arkansas Granny Dec 2016 #5

Then you see if there MFM008 Dec 2016 #6

Yup. 2naSalit Dec 2016 #7

Frankly, I'm surprised they even covered the story at all... Farmgirl1961 Dec 2016 #8

Investigating is how you GET evidence underpants Dec 2016 #9