Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

(50,254 posts)

9. Is there any way to put the whole state under an "emergency manager"?

Tue Dec 6, 2016, 10:09 PM

Dec 2016

These are the people who did that to Detroit and Flint...sounds like the need a healthy dollop of gander sauce.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Banana Fucking Republic! Chasstev365 Dec 2016 #1

Corruption is everywhere liberal N proud Dec 2016 #2

The federal government must take over madaboutharry Dec 2016 #3

I fear that it would only get worse CentralMass Dec 2016 #4

Not if it was run in a bipartisan way madaboutharry Dec 2016 #5

It would take a Constitutional amendment MichMary Dec 2016 #6

So will these votes be recounted? I'm hearing conflicted things NWCorona Dec 2016 #7

US elections: broken machines could throw Michigan recount into chaos. .99center Dec 2016 #8

So Hillary got some extra votes? n/t MichMan Dec 2016 #11

Yeah, not seeing the fuss on this, we appear to have benefited Amishman Dec 2016 #13

Is there any way to put the whole state under an "emergency manager"? Ken Burch Dec 2016 #9

hand recount. now. all hand-counted paper ballots from here on out. nt TheFrenchRazor Dec 2016 #12

87 out of how many? lonestarnot Dec 2016 #14

One out of a thousand is one too many! Feeling the Bern Dec 2016 #16

This is going to get ugly... AgadorSparticus Dec 2016 #15