Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tatiana

(14,167 posts)
14. Yes. That's exactly what I'm suggesting. Obama would not have had the election stolen.
Mon Dec 5, 2016, 02:19 AM
Dec 2016

Until we gain control of Congress and the state legislative branches to force states to switch to verifiable voting systems, our best assurance of truly winning is to not have it be close. See Obama 2008 or 2012. We all know that Al Gore won in 2000, but the election should not have been that close. He won, but he didn't achieve becoming President. So, if you are prevented from taking the oath of office -- you kinda like LOST what really matters.

Donald Trump was a moron. And more people than should have voted for this moron over the more experienced, qualified candidate. That says something about our voting public, but it also says a lot about the candidate we fielded that people voted against her more than they voted for Trump.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Dem blame game rages over...»Reply #14