Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LovingA2andMI

(7,006 posts)
21. Folks Bookmark This Comment....
Sat Dec 3, 2016, 05:13 AM
Dec 2016

In Michigan, and specifically Detroit in 2009 and 2013 -- what has been described above is how elections results should be questioned and recounts allowed.

For proof, here is a comment from the Mayoral candidate that discovered the rigging that took place:

This is quite telling. I keep getting asked how it's possible to rig an election. This will be my last comment on it and here is what folks are going to discover as to how the fix was done:

1) use the pre-programmed memory computer card to alter the true election night vote mix allocation to candidates in certain limited areas but leaving total votes cast unchanged and;

2) if a recount is requested, stall a short time to get to the cases where the mix was altered and SIMPLY put on a new security seal on the cases altered to NOT match the seal number recorded by honest workers in the election night poll book. The case cannot be opened or the paper ballot looked at!

Vio-la, the previous but now altered (rigged) computer count stands and...the rigged election is accomplished! 200 of us saw it with our own eyes...

But....what he is doing suggests that they make not have confederates to change the local seals.....uh oh!


In the 2013 Recount Effort in Detroit, this commentator saw with THEIR OWN EYES what has described above, happen. Along with plenty of other highly questionable occurrences with "Write-In Ballots".

There is another way to rig an election with the older model Diebold machines.

Particularity, the ones running the older model 256K Floppy Disks or SD Cards. The cards can be programmed with a command like (-2 Candidate #1/+3 Candidate #2/+1 Candidate #3). The net effect would allow for every vote for Candidates 2 & 3 to effectively be deleted to Candidate 1 - resulting in a net loss for Candidate #1).

Now all of the machines do NOT have to contain the program 256K cards -- just enough to make the election results fit the favor of who is attempting to rig an election. A third party supplier normally handles these cards and floppy disks.

This COURT CASE DOCKET backs up what is alleged could have taken place to "Rig Elections" in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania -- depending on the machines and scanners used.

For what occurred in 2013, this article is the best point of reference:
Massive Fraud In Detroit Election A Big Deal For Michigan

Michigan's Presidential Election in 2016 was "decided" by 10,704 votes out of an estimated 4.5 million votes cast -- or just enough to change an outcome.

This is why at our option, a recount of Michigan, along with Wisconsin and Pennsylvania is MORE THAN NECESSARY!

Thanks for reading...




Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Where are the lawyers? UCmeNdc Dec 2016 #1
More where that came from flamingdem Dec 2016 #2
No way. This can't be true. ffr Dec 2016 #3
I predict that they will find tampered machines in WI MI and PA explains why the Trumpster didn't putitinD Dec 2016 #4
A broken seal is a sign they were tampered with JonLP24 Dec 2016 #8
or maybe Drumpf can just tweet it. putitinD Dec 2016 #9
It's better if it's not on the news just yet lostnfound Dec 2016 #22
Yep, that was their first tactic the last time they tried this shit and got caught. Raster Dec 2016 #26
You would think....but the media doesn't even bother with any pretense of being legitimate anymore AgadorSparticus Dec 2016 #29
Just recount every state, to make sure no one cheated. putitinD Dec 2016 #5
Postpone the EC vote... !! pangaia Dec 2016 #6
Broken seals is a HUGE clue JonLP24 Dec 2016 #7
Republican 'family values" in action, as usual Achilleaze Dec 2016 #23
And void the warranty. Igel Dec 2016 #37
Security concerns JonLP24 Dec 2016 #38
St Croix county results JonLP24 Dec 2016 #10
Ah, so this is Russ Feingold territory..... KewlKat Dec 2016 #11
2012 results Takket Dec 2016 #39
KNR Lucinda Dec 2016 #12
Ohio and Florida voting is probably ripe with these diseases as well. C Moon Dec 2016 #13
I think the word you're looking for is . . . HuskyOffset Dec 2016 #17
Thanks. I think both work, though. :) C Moon Dec 2016 #20
So fucking predictable world wide wally Dec 2016 #14
Someone paid these people to do this. And coordinated it. The NSA has it all. McCamy Taylor Dec 2016 #15
Multiple machines seems like too much of a coincidence to not be a pattern... JudyM Dec 2016 #30
KnR Hekate Dec 2016 #16
There are seals, and there are seals... TreasonousBastard Dec 2016 #18
i'm sure there's a perfectly reasonable explaination... not. nt TheFrenchRazor Dec 2016 #19
Folks Bookmark This Comment.... LovingA2andMI Dec 2016 #21
these machines are hackable. end of story. nt TheFrenchRazor Dec 2016 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author blitzburgh55 Dec 2016 #24
Interesting tweets and video from WI blitzburgh55 Dec 2016 #25
Our electoral process is horribly compromised, CrispyQ Dec 2016 #27
keep in mind that the PTB are all "on the team," so of course they won't say anything to undermine TheFrenchRazor Dec 2016 #42
Love your screen name. CrispyQ Dec 2016 #46
thanks... it may be time to oil it up... and kicking... nt TheFrenchRazor Dec 2016 #53
knr triron Dec 2016 #54
not so fast Palmer jodymarie aimee Dec 2016 #28
St Croix uses DS200 and Expressvote - there are procedures to follow as far as seals are concerned. Ellipsis Dec 2016 #31
Known Security Concerns Aimee in OKC Dec 2016 #32
Yes indeed. Lot of vulnerabilities... but the setup routine has a sign off as far as "seals" Ellipsis Dec 2016 #33
Tracking of machines' history vs. simply ballot counting Aimee in OKC Dec 2016 #35
so wouldn't *all* the seals be broken? nt TheFrenchRazor Dec 2016 #43
No Ellipsis Dec 2016 #48
If this is true Tracyjo Dec 2016 #50
K&R nt ProudProgressiveNow Dec 2016 #34
K&R True_Blue Dec 2016 #36
One part of that stands out to me DFW Dec 2016 #40
fact is, the PTB don't care, and decent, honest poll workers are to uninformed to realize what TheFrenchRazor Dec 2016 #44
Snopes claims "Unproven" RoccoR2 Dec 2016 #45
Yes, Unproven. .99center Dec 2016 #47
This is troubling. I expect the House to launch an investigation into the matter immediately. toddwv Dec 2016 #49
Actually, the laws are enforced by the Department of Justice, who work for the person pictured. n/t PoliticAverse Dec 2016 #51
Jesus f'in Christ! stop with the conspiracy theory's! stevebreeze Dec 2016 #52
latest on this? triron Dec 2016 #55
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Wisconsin recount observe...»Reply #21