Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

certainot

(9,090 posts)
45. left has to go on offensive -no more university sports on RW radio
Wed Nov 30, 2016, 11:49 AM
Nov 2016

and boycott ALL advertisers on ALL rw radio stations

here's a letter for these universities but admin won't pay attention - it has to be the uni papers and groups that nee to get on it

Your school is on a list of 88 universities at republiconradio.org that broadcast sports on 255 of Rush Limbaugh’s 600 radio stations. They could also be called Trump radio stations.

Your university is not only mocking it’s own mission statement, it is undermining the interests of most of its students, faculty, employees, and surrounding communities.

That makes your own school a legitimate place to protest any issue related to the Trump agenda.

Many of those relationships began prior to the 90’s, before they all began broadcasting propaganda for one party. There is no reason for those schools not to start looking for apolitical alternatives immediately.

The school administration will claim that it does not make business decisions based on politics.This is a question all those schools need to ask: If a radio station went to KKK programming would the university still let its mascot be used to sell a KKK agenda?

Those stations weigh in on elections for university regents and selection of administration including presidents and chancellors - is there a conflict of interest?

All of those stations will continue to deny global warming, deny reproductive rights to women, excuse racism and homophobia, and promote and excuse the Trump agenda. Republicans want to privatize public education, social security, and the post office. Their policies will raise college tuition. They want to reverse gains in health care reform. They want to end net neutrality. Those stations will be cheerleaders for the next war, as they were for the last one.

The station pays a licensing company a fee and the school gets a part of that. The station then gets to use the school logos, mascot, and community standing to attract advertising revenue. It gets to declare things like “850 KOA, home of the Buffs,and Rush Limbaugh!” Compared with TV licensing revenue talk radio stations pay very little.

Advertising revenue is used to fund station operating costs and pay for the national and local talk show hosts that broadcast from them most of the day.

Except for occasional innocuous programming all of those stations operate exclusively for the benefit of the Republican Party. They are coordinated with national and state GOP and their allied think tanks

If Trump would pay $1000/hr for a radio ad, 1200 nationwide stations x 15hrs/day x 5 days/week are worth about $5BIL/yr FREE for Trump. 255 x $75,000 = $19,125,000/WEEK FREE for Trump, or about $1BIL/yr endorsed by institutions of higher learning.

Those stations, licensed to operate in the public interest, are heavily dependent on the schools they parasitize and they all:
- deny global warming and science
- use public airwaves to sell voter suppression legislation
- use and excuse racism, misogyny, homophobia, and hate to divide communities
- work to deny reproductive rights for women and access to contraception
- fight environmental regulation, push fracking, and always support fossil fuel solutions over renewables
- fight to defund and privatize public education, attack teachers and work to lower their salaries, attack their unions, push voucher solutions and standardized testing, and obstruct efforts to lower student debt
- fight efforts to increase minimum wage
- undermine the economic and environmental interests of their communities
- use public airways to repeat propaganda that is demonstrably false and continue to lie after being corrected
- use public airwaves but use call screeners to exclude dissenting callers

How much revenue does the licensing company pay for radio broadcasting portion compared to the TV portion? Could donors make up the difference if there is a monetary loss? If there is a loss, how does it compare with the harm it is doing to its own principles, funding, students, and surrounding communities?

Are they violating their 501c3 tax exempt status? Here’s the IRS rule for political activity:
“Political activity. - If any of the activities (whether or not substantial) of your organization consist of participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office, your organization will not qualify for tax-exempt status under section 501(c)(3). Such participation or intervention includes the publishing or distributing of statements.”

No university has a good excuse not to reexamine it’s relationship with partisan radio stations and look for apolitical alternatives. If an existing contract cannot be voided without penalty, can donors be found to cover it?

Any university, state or private, supporting Republican talk radio is shooting itself in the foot, demeaning its mission statement and professed goals and values, and harming its students’ futures.

Here is that list of universities ($1000 x 15hrs/day x 5days = $75,000/week):

ALABAMA 8 $600,000 Auburn 3, Alabama 2, Southern Alabama 2, Troy 1
ARIZONA 1 $75,000 Arizona St. 1
ARKANSAS 3 $225,000 Arkansas 3
CALIFORNIA 5 $375,000 San Jose State 2, USC 2, Fresno St. 1
COLORADO 4 $300,000 Air Force 2, Colorado 1, Colorado State 1
CONNECTICUT 1 $75,000 Connecticut 1
FLORIDA 20 $1,500,000 Florida 10, Florida St. 4 Miami 2, South Florida 2, Central Florida 2
GEORGIA 14 $1,050,000 Georgia 7, Georgia Tech 5, Georgia Southern 2
IDAHO 7 $525,000 Boise St. 4, Idaho 3
ILLINOIS 7 $525,000 Illinois 7
INDIANA 11 $825,000 Notre Dame 6, Purdue 4, Indiana 1
IOWA 5 $375,000 Iowa 4, Iowa St. 1
KANSAS 4 $300,000 Kansas St. 2, Kansas 1, Wichita St. 1
KENTUCKY 3 $225,000 Louisville 2, Kentucky 1
LOUSIANA 3 $225,000 LSU 2, La.-Monroe 1
MARYLAND 2 $150,000 Maryland 2
MASSACHUSETTS 1 $75,000 Boston College 1
MICHIGAN 19 $1,425,000 Michigan St. 11, Michigan 7, Western Michigan 1
MINNESOTA 4 $300,000 Minnesota 4
MISSISSIPPI 6 Mississippi St. 3, Mississippi 2, Southern Miss 1
MISSOURI 6 $450,000 Missouri 6
NEBRASKA 6 $450,000 Nebraska 6
NEVADA 1 $75,000 Nevada 1
NEW JERSEY 2 $150,000 Rutgers 1, Seton Hall 1
NEW MEXICO 3 $225,000 New Mexico 2, New Mexico St. 1
NEW YORK 7 $525,000 Syracuse 6, Army 1
NORTH CAROLINA 16 $1,200,000 North Carolina 8, North Carolina State 3, Duke 3, East Carolina 2
OHIO 10 $750,000 Ohio St. 6, Toledo 1, Dayton 1, Bowling Green 1, Xavier 1
OKLAHOMA 5 $375,000 Oklahoma St. 3, Oklahoma 1, Oral Roberts 1
OREGON 12 $900,000 Oregon St. 7, Oregon 5
PENNSYLVANIA 14 $1,050,000 Penn St. 11, Pittsburgh 2, Temple 1
SOUTH CAROLINA 4 $300,000 South Carolina 2, Clemson 2
TENNESSEE 7 $525,000 Tennessee 4, Memphis 3
TEXAS 16 $1,200,000 Texas A&M 9, Texas Tech 4, Texas 1, Texas Christian 1, Baylor 1
UTAH 1 $75,000 Utah St. 1
VIRGINIA 6 $450,000 Virginia Tech 5, Virginia 1
WASHINGTON 6 $450,000 Washington 5, Washington St. 1
WEST VIRGINIA 2 $150,000 West Virginia 1, Marshall 1
WISCONSIN 3 $225,000 Wisconsin 3

There is no excuse for any school to support Trump radio.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A huge mistake democrank Nov 2016 #1
We can't offer unrealistic things to voters in those states like 2,000 mile long walls.... dubyadiprecession Dec 2016 #128
That's my take. TexasProgresive Nov 2016 #2
Here in Texas it was the first national election in many decades that I saw a political ad by Dustlawyer Nov 2016 #5
that would be great NewJeffCT Nov 2016 #31
Registration of all of the Hispanic population in the Rio Grand Valley Dustlawyer Nov 2016 #51
Not sure where you live, but Clinton ads were running almost constantly here the last month or two TwilightZone Nov 2016 #53
I would like to see some support from the DNC for local races. TexasProgresive Nov 2016 #55
and that is why I cannot understand why Howard Dean didn't continue as DNC chair still_one Nov 2016 #3
Pres. Obama seems cold towards Dean....I don't know why. Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #6
I know, it is a mystery to me also still_one Nov 2016 #9
I mean Debbie was a disaster long before 16 Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #10
Debbie and Pelosi were disasters metroins Nov 2016 #38
Pelosi had nothing to do with it. Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #50
Pelosi was re-elected leader today. Ken Burch Nov 2016 #103
I heard that. My son was not happy but I think it is for the best. Demsrule86 Dec 2016 #113
Unnnnh.....Pelosi is still our minority leader in the House, and she's likely to keep that gig. MADem Nov 2016 #76
Pelosi Got Done Me. Nov 2016 #80
I agree that Pelosi did everything Obama asked, but I never once heard any MADem Nov 2016 #85
That Particular Bit Had To Do With DWS Me. Nov 2016 #90
I think that little story might be a "Some people say" conflation. MADem Nov 2016 #95
A Bit Of Background Me. Nov 2016 #96
Take everything you hear from POLITICO, especially shit from "former" operatives on the D team, MADem Nov 2016 #97
I Didn't Like The Whole Bernie Situation And The Way She Was Treated Me. Nov 2016 #98
Kaine was part of a team that beat the Orange Anus by north of two million votes. MADem Nov 2016 #99
Yes, I Will Say Me. Nov 2016 #100
I thought he was a swell guy. Surprised at his command of Spanish. MADem Nov 2016 #105
I Too Want Competence Me. Nov 2016 #106
We need competence, and that's Dean. MADem Nov 2016 #109
On That Me. Nov 2016 #111
He was told to pick her awoke_in_2003 Nov 2016 #43
Oh bull shit. Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #48
No, she is who HE wanted. nt MADem Nov 2016 #75
Then we know where to lay it. nt awoke_in_2003 Nov 2016 #77
I say we "lay" it right where it belongs--at Putin's feet. nt MADem Nov 2016 #83
Obama got to choose...and it is probably not fair to blame Debbie for all our losses. Demsrule86 Dec 2016 #117
She was chosen because she is one of the BEST fundraisers in the USA. MADem Dec 2016 #119
Wasn't she Clinton's campaign chair in 2008? jalan48 Nov 2016 #58
Probably because Dean didn't favor him in 2008. MADem Nov 2016 #11
Maybe. Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #49
Howard Dean understands rural voters NoGoodNamesLeft Nov 2016 #66
I agree with you there. He understands, but he doesn't pander. MADem Nov 2016 #74
Yes, Dean doesn't get nearly enough credit NoGoodNamesLeft Nov 2016 #91
I'm from MA....but I preferred Dean to Kerry as a candidate. MADem Nov 2016 #94
I am 100% in agreement BlueMTexpat Dec 2016 #131
Jealous of his skills? Maybe Dean never" kissed his ring?" Dr. Mullion Blasto Nov 2016 #64
I don't fault Obama for advising Trump. Qutzupalotl Nov 2016 #92
I agree...can't stand the 'let's get along bullshit. Demsrule86 Dec 2016 #116
Rahm Me. Nov 2016 #78
I did not know that ....thanks for the information. Demsrule86 Dec 2016 #115
So did most of the party, by the end. Ken Burch Dec 2016 #120
I Simply Never Understood Why Obama Did That Me. Dec 2016 #124
I think in the beginning he was understandably nervous RelativelyJones Dec 2016 #126
Could Be Me. Dec 2016 #127
The Clinton team (at the time) didn't like Dean. Gore1FL Nov 2016 #19
Dean wanted the job at HHS. BlueMTexpat Dec 2016 #130
You realize that's not why we lost, right? brooklynite Nov 2016 #4
Running the right candidates in all 50 states will help. Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #7
That won't be popular here! But you are ENTIRELY correct. One must cut the cloth to the measure. MADem Nov 2016 #82
The country seemed to take rightward turn to me...hope I am wrong. Demsrule86 Dec 2016 #114
There's no place, though, where it helps us to run Dems Ken Burch Dec 2016 #121
Ken I disagree and the ACA is a bad example because Demsrule86 Dec 2016 #122
Card-check on union elections is another example. Ken Burch Dec 2016 #123
but one in places like Michigan and PA would have DonCoquixote Nov 2016 #8
At least the MI vote awoke_in_2003 Nov 2016 #44
Who? tavernier Nov 2016 #12
Campaign Lotusflower70 Nov 2016 #32
We had a powerful turnout machine and they had a 3.5% increase in voting population across the uponit7771 Nov 2016 #13
ALL the states should matter. They dont. Thats the point. democrank Nov 2016 #17
"Powerful turnout operations" that had people showing up to the doors Chakab Nov 2016 #23
Hillary didn't visit Wisconsin once and only refocused on NWCorona Nov 2016 #24
But getting resources to the Rust Belt would have. It didn't happen. Democrats on the ground there KittyWampus Nov 2016 #25
Could be -- though I'm not so sure as you about "why we lost" struggle4progress Nov 2016 #67
Plus 1 Auggie Nov 2016 #86
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2016 #101
I think people like to use buzzwords to describe things they don't get. Drunken Irishman Nov 2016 #14
No, I can't agree that this point is 100% wrong. mountain grammy Nov 2016 #16
Everything I said was 100% true. Drunken Irishman Nov 2016 #33
I agree 100% Grey Lemercier Nov 2016 #41
I wasn't talking about this election mountain grammy Nov 2016 #42
Thank you. Indeed, the damage WAS done over decades, and the Dems Nay Nov 2016 #73
That's not what stopped her. Exilednight Nov 2016 #63
A 50-state strategy has everything to do with a presidential election. democrank Nov 2016 #18
Take a look at Obama's map in 2012. Drunken Irishman Nov 2016 #35
In this case what you wrote BumRushDaShow Nov 2016 #20
She didn't campaign much at all in PA. Drunken Irishman Nov 2016 #36
Hate to say but that is a bit of bullshit BumRushDaShow Nov 2016 #57
I agree at the presidential level mythology Nov 2016 #22
It would put Democratic offices/resources in areas we could monitor elections for fraud. KittyWampus Nov 2016 #29
She didn't invest much of anything into the Rust Belt. And Democrats there asked for resources. KittyWampus Nov 2016 #28
You have to pick and choose your battles. Drunken Irishman Nov 2016 #37
Not arguing that point. But we need to have rural Democrats with some basic training/organization KittyWampus Nov 2016 #87
8 years ago zipplewrath Nov 2016 #54
We had some good candidates. People like Russ Feingold. Drunken Irishman Nov 2016 #110
Yep. As I wrote below, "50-state strategy" is just a catchy phrase. Not a reality. Garrett78 Nov 2016 #68
Here's what the state legislatures look like struggle4progress Nov 2016 #71
all of the tweeks together would not total half the monumental mistake of certainot Nov 2016 #15
THIS BumRushDaShow Nov 2016 #27
left has to go on offensive -no more university sports on RW radio certainot Nov 2016 #45
As an interesting but sad sidenote BumRushDaShow Nov 2016 #62
Agreed. It was a stroke of genius for RW to use the radio to the max. It's how Nay Nov 2016 #79
we need 50 state elections! mopinko Nov 2016 #21
That would have the opposite effect SomethingNew Nov 2016 #59
there is nothing about it that negates a 50 state strategy. mopinko Nov 2016 #60
At the presidential level SomethingNew Nov 2016 #61
and there is a problem with that why? mopinko Dec 2016 #112
Yup! NWCorona Nov 2016 #26
We failed to address the needs of those at the bottom who have suffered the most, TonyPDX Nov 2016 #30
I would agree with that Lotusflower70 Nov 2016 #39
I think that we SHOULD have a 50-State Strategy Proud Liberal Dem Nov 2016 #34
Winning comes first, especially on the state level where redistricting happens. alarimer Nov 2016 #93
I agree with you 100% on redistricting. Proud Liberal Dem Nov 2016 #108
My experience has been that those who yell loudest for the 50-state-strategy sweetloukillbot Dec 2016 #125
Sad but true Lotusflower70 Nov 2016 #40
Yep. I wish for Howard Dean as DNC chair WhiteTara Nov 2016 #46
We aren't ready for 50 state strategy hollowdweller Nov 2016 #47
I think you can zipplewrath Nov 2016 #56
I think Howard Dean should come back as DNC chair. We had our strongest showings with him hrmjustin Nov 2016 #52
50-state strategy is a catchy phrase but never has been a reality. Garrett78 Nov 2016 #65
When we don't aim at the whole map, we lose: Obama's adventures with Congress struggle4progress Nov 2016 #69
No candidate from either party has aimed at the whole map. Garrett78 Nov 2016 #70
We need a better machine struggle4progress Nov 2016 #72
Even more to the point, having a Democratic president is useless if he is Nay Nov 2016 #81
After 2008 the DNC ceased in it's main function... vi5 Nov 2016 #84
Agree. And this is why we need Howard Dean back as the DNC chair (nt) question everything Nov 2016 #88
Yes. One of several. n/t lumberjack_jeff Nov 2016 #89
Dem PTB have run from Dr. Dean's plans for a long time, elleng Nov 2016 #102
Yes, it was! LisaM Nov 2016 #104
Yes to 50 state strategy, no to Howard Dean PatsFan87 Nov 2016 #107
Totally agree. Obama ousted Howard Dean, Obama kept DWS on - two big mistakes. Justice Dec 2016 #118
I don't know how many times BlueMTexpat Dec 2016 #129
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»It was a mistake to aband...»Reply #45