Are you atheist or agnostic? Why not be both? [View all]

On the one hand, I take the philosophical position the absence of evidence is indeed evidence of absence.
So I'm an atheist.

But while that evidence is sufficient for plausible inference it is not absolute proof.
So I'm an agnostic.

I fully admit I cannot prove that no god exists, but I can to a pretty good job of refutation for the flavors of almighty that believers actually believe in.

But if I need to pick a label, I'll say I'm an atheist.