Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

TexasTowelie

(122,506 posts)
Sun Apr 12, 2020, 01:04 PM Apr 2020

State and city vs. churches: Don't drink the 'religious freedom' Kool-Aid -- it's deadly [View all]

Last edited Sun Apr 12, 2020, 02:22 PM - Edit history (1)

Imagine that you awake one morning, get online and click on your favorite news site. You are greeted by this grisly headline: “Police Seek Death Cult Leaders After Ritual Human Sacrifice.” You read on to discover that these cultists have been rounding up victims to offer up as sacrifices to their God, killing them in indescribable ceremonies (drinking not just proverbial Kool-Aid, but the literal kind) and leaving their corpses on open-air altars. A couple of days later, you are relieved to see that the leaders of the sect have been arrested and charged with murder, only to discover that they are claiming that the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment protects their actions, because the government may not interfere with or punish religious conduct.

Your reaction, I hope, would be that their religious freedom claim is preposterous. One person or group’s freedom of religion does not permit them to do harm to others, or to be exempt from the application of the societal ban on murder. You would expect that the courts would promptly reject the claim and try the murderers for their crimes.

And yet, this is precisely the claim that too many religious leaders have been making in recent days — that their right to free exercise gives them the right to kill their fellow citizens. Not, of course, in a human sacrifice straight out of a horror movie. But by holding services during a pandemic, despite knowing to a point of absolute certainty that people will die as a result. We must treat their argument exactly the same way we would react to the cult: with a firm, “Hell no,” and criminal sanctions.

Mass gatherings (religious and otherwise) spread COVID-19. There is massive evidence of this fact and no proof to the contrary. The dozens of cases and numerous deaths that resulted from a single church revival meeting in Dawson Springs, Kentucky. in mid-March is sobering, ample proof of what results when churches insist on conducting business as usual. And it is not just members of the church or those who voluntarily choose to attend who are put at risk. It is everyone they then come in contact with — and it is those people whose lives these church leaders are insisting must be sacrificed on the altar of their religious freedom.

Read more: https://www.leoweekly.com/2020/04/state-city-vs-churches-dont-drink-religious-freedom-kool-aid-deadly/
(Louisville Eccentric Observer)

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fundies customerserviceguy Apr 2020 #1
We could I guess Kaiserguy Apr 2020 #6
K and R Ferrets are Cool Apr 2020 #2
Your right to swing your fist bluescribbler Apr 2020 #3
Exactly where literalism and legal gymnastics gets us. n/t MarcA Apr 2020 #4
I've been listen to my emergency services monitor and have noticed a big spike in covid yaesu Apr 2020 #5
Exercising the practice of religion is not imposing your personal beliefs on others dlk Apr 2020 #7
See Evangelizing DanieRains Apr 2020 #10
Yes dlk Apr 2020 #19
LEO is the Louisville Eccentric Observer Roland99 Apr 2020 #8
Ah, thank you. TexasTowelie Apr 2020 #11
No worries. It was founded by current Rep John Yarmuth Roland99 Apr 2020 #12
I know that it is the alternative media, TexasTowelie Apr 2020 #14
Ha. Roland99 Apr 2020 #17
The religious liberty arguments are preposterous. TomSlick Apr 2020 #9
Dang it! Stop making sense! Quit it with the sound logic!! paleotn Apr 2020 #16
Sorry, occupational hazard. TomSlick Apr 2020 #18
I honestly don't see mass gatherings for Jebuz happening. LiberalLovinLug Apr 2020 #13
Matthew 4:7 paleotn Apr 2020 #15
Of course they don't. For them it's all wnylib Apr 2020 #21
It's OK. They are the ones insisting this is a "Christian Nation" when it ain't. rickyhall Apr 2020 #20
No excuse for this self-centered wnylib Apr 2020 #22
How can any court allow a group to claim the right to endanger the general population? uriel1972 Apr 2020 #23
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»State and city vs. church...»Reply #0