Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Writing

Bernardo de La Paz

(58,798 posts)

4. Your link actually says:

Reply to DavidDvorkin (Reply #3)

Mon Sep 22, 2025, 01:43 PM

Monday

(emphasis added)

AI and the Courts

AI increasingly is being used in court administration and the criminal justice system. Judges are encountering legal issues with AI, and several courts have issued opinions raising concerns or imposing constraints on lawyers’ use of AI. Deepfakes and AI are creating daunting challenges for the authentication and use of evidence in court, such as to establish the reliability and integrity of evidence.

It is the judges who are sanctioning lawyers for using AI that I was thinking of (highlighted portion).

Court administration (scheduling, case assignment, personnel issues like vacation time) is separate from adjudication.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A snippet of future history [View all] DavidDvorkin Monday OP

"You Knew I Was a Snake When You Climbed On'! The Roux Comes First Monday #1

Premise in first sentence clause is bogus. Courts are not going that way. They are going the opposite way. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Monday #2

"AI increasingly is being used in court administration and the criminal justice system." DavidDvorkin Monday #3

Your link actually says: Bernardo de La Paz Monday #4

That does not contradict the first sentence DavidDvorkin Monday #5

I do not think it is inevitable. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Monday #6