Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Science Fiction

In reply to the discussion: Short Attention Span [View all]

PoindexterOglethorpe

(28,049 posts)
10. The unedited version was bloated and boring.
Tue Aug 26, 2025, 02:07 AM
Tuesday

I've stopped reading King because after "Firestarter" he was no longer edited. Aaarrrggggrhhh!!!! He writes at least 30% more verbiage than is needed. Probably a whole lot more. I don't know exactly, because I've stopped reading him. Too bad.

I am a science fiction writer myself. Short stories. I've also edited two anthologies. King needs serious editing, trust me.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Short Attention Span [View all] yankee87 Monday OP
I support post-apoplectic books jfz9580m Monday #1
I enjoyed Make Room! Make Room! The Blue Flower Monday #2
Thanks jfz9580m Monday #3
Alas, Babylon by Pat Frank. PoindexterOglethorpe Tuesday #7
Thabks jfz9580m Tuesday #8
You and I need to spend some time talking. PoindexterOglethorpe Tuesday #9
The Stand, by Stephen King rickyhall Monday #4
That's always been one of my favorites FoxNewsSucks Monday #5
The unedited version was bloated and boring. PoindexterOglethorpe Tuesday #10
Not sure how many pages, FoxNewsSucks Monday #6
I assume you read the classic from 1959 by Pat Frank... Pluvious Tuesday #11
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science Fiction»Short Attention Span»Reply #10