Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Media

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)

12. You have still not answered the economics for the stations

Reply to certainot (Reply #10)

Tue Dec 13, 2011, 03:12 AM

Dec 2011

RW Talk brings in more $$$ than anything else, including progressive talk. Yes some liberal hosts can bring in a decent market share in some locales, but overall the ratings are with the right wing for talk radio. Ratings = $$$ for the station. Radio is a green eye shade business, always has been.

Not sure how you can claim the KGO massacre was "was a political move, getting ready for the elections". Bay area is solid Democratic. The station management says it was economics, and the rest of radio industry bears that out.

Who has "real callers" and the possible existence of subsidies are not really relevant to station operators. They don't get them. Limbaugh COSTS THEM $$$ to carry and many stations are paying for it since it still makes the largest profit for them.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Progressive AM Radio [View all] SHRED Dec 2011 OP

I doubt it. ProfessionalLeftist Dec 2011 #1

Not a conspiracy... kwikset Dec 2011 #2

It is indeed a green eyeshade business ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2011 #4

you mean in a country that voted overwhelmingly for obama 95% want limbaugh? certainot Dec 2011 #6

You confuse talk radio listeners with the electorate ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2011 #7

i recognize the difference but his 'popularity' is not a reflection of the 'market' certainot Dec 2011 #8

Independent radio station owners I know would disagree with you ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2011 #9

that was a political move, getting ready for the elections. and plenty of progressives are making $ certainot Dec 2011 #10

You have still not answered the economics for the stations ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2011 #12

so you're saying 95% of talk radio listeners are racist idiots who like blowhards who've been wrong certainot Dec 2011 #14

Why KGO was blown up LTR Dec 2011 #16

i'm not very familiar with the KGO situation except that is looks like they replaced some certainot Dec 2011 #18

PS limbaugh IS the republican party so he is going to get that in any location. certainot Dec 2011 #11

+10 shcrane71 Mar 2012 #22

i don't think you're right on that first sentence. certainot Dec 2011 #5

"...they subsidized it to start it..." Jenoch Feb 2013 #28

I disagree in the case of 1360 KLSD in San Diego SHRED Dec 2011 #13

But was the bottom line better? ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2011 #17

Here is my take on the situation mrdmk Dec 2011 #3

Clear Channel's always been about money more than politics LTR Dec 2011 #15

if that was the case 95% of talk radio wouldn't be right wing certainot Dec 2011 #19

if that was the case 95% of talk radio wouldn't be right wing certainot Dec 2011 #20

" the profit driven market argument makes no sense- it's an excuse that's used all the time to shcrane71 Mar 2012 #23

no-holds-barred mike malloy just pointed out they're under assault, need funding, sponsorship certainot Mar 2012 #21

But we have progressive radio in our area. occupy this. Mar 2012 #24

Is that on the AM dial? Where do you live? shcrane71 Mar 2012 #25

Detroit Progressive Talk Radio WDTW GONE! Downriver Doc Jan 2013 #26

Ick - freerepublic! Here's a better source... cyberswede Jan 2013 #27