Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

krispos42

(49,445 posts)

6. Locking

Reply to tortoise1956 (Original post)

Fri Jun 30, 2017, 12:03 PM

Jun 2017

This post does not fit into the scope of the Group, as it is not gun control/ 2nd Amendment/ gun policy discussion, nor it is a self-defense topic.

It's about what arms the government should issue to its soldiers, and that, IMO, belongs in the National Security & Defense Group.

Obviously, whatever the military chooses will have some bleed-over into the civilian firearms world, and discussions about that belong here.

Regards,
Krispos42, Group Host

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ideas for the next Army battle rifle [View all] tortoise1956 Jun 2017 OP

Specs, schmecs, I already know the answer. sfwriter Jun 2017 #1

Might be some truth to that... tortoise1956 Jun 2017 #2

... orangecrush Jun 2017 #3

If we choose one of these rounds for the new rifle... ExciteBike66 Jun 2017 #4

I think current doctrine and training lend themselves to allowing a heavier round. SQUEE Jun 2017 #5

Locking krispos42 Jun 2017 #6