Gun Control & RKBA

Changing the subject, and/or moving the goalposts is what you're doing, in an effort to add ambiguity where none previously existed.

You don't just get to steer things away from discomforting facts, sorry.


This was the original point of contention in this subthread:



I replied that the facts show that it just isn't so, which happens to be empirically true. Otherwise known as an unassailable fact.

You replied with:



And I replied by saying "Disagree all you like, the facts speak for themselves."

Then just two posts later, you assert that "But determining what the facts are is not easy."

If I saw you driving in the same manner as you're posting, I'd notify police, because you're that all over the place.



You define 'intense' very differently than the rest of us, apparently. Just under 1 in 4 Americans agree with your interpretation, while just over 3 out of 4 agree that it protects an individual right.

If by 'intense' you mean that a tiny insignificant handful of extremist gun haters differ with the supermajority of Americans on what the second amendment actually means, then I grant you your point.