Gun Control & RKBA

sarisataka

(21,804 posts)

26. Know your history...

Reply to Human101948 (Reply #17)

Wed Oct 21, 2015, 12:25 PM

Oct 2015

The first shot fired were at Lexington and Concord, April 19, 1775.

If you read the history of the Continental Congress https://history.state.gov/milestones/1776-1783/continental-congress

Furthermore, on October 26 {1774}, the delegates drafted a formal petition outlining the colonists' grievances for British King George III. Many delegates were skeptical about changing the king’s attitude towards the colonies, but believed that every opportunity should be exhausted to de-escalate the conflict before taking more radical action. They did not draft such a letter to the British Parliament as the colonists viewed the Parliament as the aggressor behind the recent Intolerable Acts. Lastly, not fully expecting the standoff in Massachusetts to explode into full-scale war, the Congress agreed to reconvene in Philadelphia on May 10, 1775.

By the time Congress met again, war was already underway, and thus the delegates to the Second Continental Congress formed the Continental army and dispatched George Washington to Massachusetts as its commander. Meanwhile, Congress drafted the Olive Branch Petition, which attempted to suggest means of resolving disputes between the colonies and Great Britain. Congress sent the petition to King George III on July 8, but he refused to receive it.

The first resistance was formed, not under the auspices of the Continental Congress but, by the People themselves.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why "a free state" as opposed to "the state"? [View all] Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 OP

Defense against what? Human101948 Oct 2015 #1

I don't think the army of the crown wore jackboots in those days but if you're referring to Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #3

Certainly they killed British officers and troops as members of a militia or army... Human101948 Oct 2015 #12

All of them. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #14

A unique reinterpretation of history... Human101948 Oct 2015 #17

Who formed the Continental Congress? Who appointed the officers? Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #18

They were not self-appointed... Human101948 Oct 2015 #21

The colonies had no legal authority to appoint them. The colonies belonged to the Crown. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #22

It was not a group of unorganized individuals... Human101948 Oct 2015 #23

No, they were not unorganized. They were self-organized. Even anarchists do that. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #31

Know your history... sarisataka Oct 2015 #26

It is not applicable today upaloopa Oct 2015 #2

The idea of a free state has no place in the modern world? Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #4

The idea of citizen-militias with rifles defending a 21st century First-World country. DetlefK Oct 2015 #6

You mean like Vietnam, Afghanistan or Cuba? DonP Oct 2015 #7

"...the right of the people to keep and bear explosives shall not be infringed." DetlefK Oct 2015 #9

Common misconception sarisataka Oct 2015 #10

Sounds like you have a problem with the first amendment too beardown Oct 2015 #13

And the purpose of the militia is to secure "a free state" -- not "the state." Hence the OP. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #15

The Swiss aren't prepping to wage war against their own country. DetlefK Oct 2015 #25

Well, it certainly wouldn't be worth it for their own government to wage war on them. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #29

In 1968 we used to see the red light on the horizon upaloopa Oct 2015 #32

I'm guessing the enemy was resoundingly defeated. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #33

And all that hardware is why we won against the little men with rifles, oh wait. DonP Oct 2015 #34

Do you think you could pacify 80+ million people with over 300 million weapons? Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #8

It doesn't take violence for a tyrant to prevent a revolution. DetlefK Oct 2015 #11

Your every argument seems to depend on very lurid fantasies. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #16

How many Germans opposed Hitler? DetlefK Oct 2015 #19

So because the Germans abrogated their basic human decency that gives you the moral authority Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #20

All I'm saying is that weapons don't guarantee freedom from tyranny. DetlefK Oct 2015 #24

"How likely is a tyranny to break out?" Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #30

Gordian Knot complexity valuation beardown Oct 2015 #35

Many non-Germans did. Straw Man Oct 2015 #36

Tyrants discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2015 #28

On insurrection, etc.: Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #39

"Well, tell me how many militia-men and how many rifles it would take to take down the FBI..." beevul Oct 2015 #40

Oh, you're dreaming of a big, clear-cut revolution of good-vs-evil. DetlefK Oct 2015 #41

I'm dreaming? Its YOUR hypothetical. beevul Oct 2015 #42

My bad. I had lost track of this thread. DetlefK Oct 2015 #43

No problem. I appreciate you owning up to it. beevul Oct 2015 #45

But this would lead to new problems for the rebels: DetlefK Oct 2015 #46

Feel free to start a repeal movement, keep us posted on the progress DonP Oct 2015 #5

Were not sarisataka Oct 2015 #27

The Militia were STATE entities, long before the 2nd was authored, jmg257 Oct 2015 #37

I've read several of the opinions offered in your thread discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2015 #38

a Free State...a republican gov't. And how it is to remain so, via the Militias. jmg257 Oct 2015 #44