Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lionel Mandrake

(4,166 posts)
11. I agree
Fri Aug 22, 2014, 11:55 AM
Aug 2014

that the main verb is "saw" and that "I" is the subject of the sentence.

I tend to agree that "it happen" is an object clause, but other interpretations are possible.

I doubt that the verb "happen" is a past subjunctive, but you may be right about that as well. As Igel pointed out in post #5, your explanation depends on your theory. Traditional grammar and Chomskyan transformational grammar, for example, may yield different interpretations of "I saw it happen".

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Looks like "it happen" is the object of the verb "saw". Scuba Aug 2014 #1
It does look that way. Lionel Mandrake Aug 2014 #2
The mood could be sad, happy, disappointed - depends on what "it" was. Scuba Aug 2014 #3
Now that's funny. Lionel Mandrake Aug 2014 #4
Your explanation depends on your theory. Igel Aug 2014 #5
Thank you for the scholarly reply, but Lionel Mandrake Aug 2014 #6
I saw it happen Starboard Tack Aug 2014 #7
It's true that the subject or object of a sentence can be a clause, Lionel Mandrake Aug 2014 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author Starboard Tack Aug 2014 #9
The main verb is "saw" Starboard Tack Aug 2014 #10
I agree Lionel Mandrake Aug 2014 #11
Well, I come from the school of traditional grammar Starboard Tack Aug 2014 #12
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Languages and Linguistics»Can anyone explain the sy...»Reply #11