Creative Speculation

Ohio Joe

(21,896 posts)

43. Moderation is very different on DU3 then DU2

Sun Dec 18, 2011, 02:56 PM

Dec 2011

You are free to ask Lithos anything you want... He is, of course, under no obligation to provide you any answers.

Hosts can indeed lock OP's that do not meet the Groups Statement of Purpose or that violate the Terms of Service. I suggest you read each of them as they are not the same as DU2. The SoP for each Forum/Group is found at the top of each thread list. The ToS has a link at the bottom of each page. Hosts also have the ability to ban disrupters from Groups (not Forums) that they are Hosts of.

Replies the are found objectionable, go to Juries and/or Admins (for ToS violations). It is important to fill out an alert correctly, give an explanation as to why an alert is being given and be sure to check the ToS violation box if the post is a violation of the ToS.

This being a contentious Group, I suspect Skinner asked Lithos to take on the Host duties since the Group has been unable to decide for ourselves. My votes for Hosts went to Bolo and Spooked. Be sure to help the Group figure out who should be Host in this thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1135145

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

49 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I must object to Lithos being assigned as Host of this Group. [View all] Make7 Dec 2011 OP

I was hoping Lithos and undergroundrailroad both would throw their hats into the ring Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #1

Lithos has been mod of this group for, like, ever jberryhill Dec 2011 #2

By the letter, there was never a 9/11 Group, Conspiracy Group, Speculation Group, etc... greyl Dec 2011 #4

AFAIK Lithos never posted anything noise Dec 2011 #5

Who better to keep the peace? jberryhill Dec 2011 #7

Concur. Sort of a Cincinnatus of the Creative Speculation forum. n/t Nuclear Unicorn Dec 2011 #49

I think Make7 made his point quite clearly. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #6

I guess I just don't see it as that big a deal jberryhill Dec 2011 #8

Well, the group didn't decide to have one or not. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #9

If we had someone doing that jberryhill Dec 2011 #10

I think a clear majority of those who replied thought there should be at least 1 host. greyl Dec 2011 #41

yes, perhaps so. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #42

I don't have a problem with him. I like Lithos. Make7 Dec 2011 #47

Funny how that played out flying rabbit Dec 2011 #3

TOTALLY AGREE BeFree Dec 2011 #11

just for the record, hosts don't need to have a star as far as I know maddezmom Dec 2011 #12

oops, wrong place maddezmom Dec 2011 #14

This message was self-deleted by its author Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #16

As far as I can determine, this is your first statement on the matter anywhere in this new group. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #13

Just logged on 1st time BeFree Dec 2011 #17

That's what we'd been working up to in the various host discussion threads we had going. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #20

jmo, but I have no problem with Lithos being the first host and I think there should be others maddezmom Dec 2011 #15

Lithos would have gotten my vote Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #18

Can we question Lithos now? BeFree Dec 2011 #19

there are no mods anymore and like i said I didn't post much here, but didn't mean I didn't read. maddezmom Dec 2011 #21

Yes, I know BeFree Dec 2011 #22

not sure what you mean maddezmom Dec 2011 #23

Question BeFree Dec 2011 #24

I don't have a clear position...I'm not in either camp so to speak. maddezmom Dec 2011 #25

Thank you BeFree Dec 2011 #26

I think the Bush Adminstration has a measure of guilt. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #27

Yes BeFree Dec 2011 #28

And since maddezmom and I agree, I'm cool by you as well? n/t Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #29

to be fair BeFree Dec 2011 #30

I like her words that I quoted. I wouldn't change a thing. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #35

Do you remember? BeFree Dec 2011 #39

I do remember, and I said nothing totally different at all. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #40

What is 'BUSHCO"? n/t zappaman Dec 2011 #31

to me it's shorthand for the Bush Administration maddezmom Dec 2011 #32

so everyone in the BUSH administration is guilty of something when it comes to 9/11? zappaman Dec 2011 #34

no not everyone, like I said it's shorthand maddezmom Dec 2011 #37

BUSH'SINNERCIRCLECO zappaman Dec 2011 #38

ignoring you, z BeFree Dec 2011 #33

of course you are because you can't answer the question. zappaman Dec 2011 #36

Moderation is very different on DU3 then DU2 Ohio Joe Dec 2011 #43

I am surprised to see this since this was supposed to be a group decision. Grateful for Hope Dec 2011 #44

Shouldn't there be some kind of vote? Cherchez la Femme Dec 2011 #45

That was my understanding. Grateful for Hope Dec 2011 #46

I agree with the OP. eomer Dec 2011 #48