Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

erronis

(19,993 posts)
5. Good way of putting it. But "making decisions based on insufficient information" is not the
Sun May 7, 2023, 01:27 PM
May 2023

same as formulating theories on how something works and then being able to test it, repeatedly.

That, to me, is the greatest difficulty in treating anecdotal evidence as hard data. Each individual is a separate observation and has a myriad of variables, all of which will change over time. And then we need to get most of the data by watching and questioning the subject which is not reproducible or stringent.

In the hard sciences these theories can be retested and the subjects are usually pretty hard objects that react in some known way over time and environment.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Are psychology and psychi...»Reply #5