Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OnTheOtherHand

(7,621 posts)
2. I guess there are two pieces to this
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 11:17 PM
Jan 2012

One is what initially motivates people to predict apocalypses. I think there are many motivations. They variously include, in no particular order: a desire to see other people get their comeuppance; some sort of assumptions about the nature of life (e.g., that God will destroy all injustice or that mass violence is the inevitable consequence of human striving); a propensity to believe engaging stories compellingly told; the existence of actual grave dangers; and the excitement of knowing something other people don't. (I'm not sure if you had in mind the first of those, the last of them, or something else.)

Once people expect apocalypses, it's often hard to get them to abandon the expectation -- and that may have something to do with wanting to prove that they are right. It doesn't seem to me that just wanting to be proven right is much incentive for apocalypse in particular, unless it's "right" as in "one of the elect."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»dumb apocalypse question»Reply #2