Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unblock

(55,431 posts)
8. The constitution is a balancing act. It's not an absolute as some gun nuts would insist
Fri Dec 31, 2021, 07:34 PM
Dec 2021

Just look at the first amendment. No law abridging freedom of speech, etc.

And yet, you can't defame, you can't threaten, you can't incite panic or riot, you can't defraud, you can't commit treason, you can't lie in certain official situations, etc.

Tons of restrictions on freedom of speech because the constitution has other objectives that must be balanced against freedom of speech.


Same goes for the second amendment. The constitution is also about enduring domestic tranquility and promoting the general welfare. There has to be some balance for that against an unfettered right to arm oneself to the teeth.

If it's too dangerous to simple beboutvin public because some gun nut might go around shooting people for no good reason, then the government has a responsibility to address that.

The second amendment must be respected, but that doesn't mean we can't have reasonable restrictions, same as we have reasonable restrictions on free speech.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»If the "Founding Fathers"...»Reply #8