Creative Speculation

... under Bush because he was a "free market economist" who HATED labor regulations and unions and who devoted his career to arguing that the minimum wage and unions hurt the economy.

Reynolds says WTC7 must have been a controlled demolition because it looked like a controlled demolition and he doesn't understand how it could be anything but a controlled demolition. Clearly, another thing he doesn't understand is what constitutes sound facts and valid logic. Another thing he apparently doesn't understand is how foolish he sounds to people who can explain the collapse quite well with actual physics and structural mechanics and who don't believe in magical silent explosives.

He also believes that no planes were involved in the 9/11 attacks, so even other "truthers" think he makes "truthers" look like idiots. And they're right.

Thanks for another squat and dump, wildbill.