Foreign Affairs

Since the list of videos on their playlist are exceedingly long I won't subscribe because I doubt that the majority of DU members will watch. The audience at DU is the general public with a liberal bias rather than the much narrower group who are interested in virology.

My point when I said that the virus either evolved or engineered should more accurately be stated that the virus is a result of natural processes or it was artificially manipulated. If the title of the video you provided is accurate, then it supports the theory that the virus is a product of nature rather than grown in a lab.

Anyway, I have my own doubts about what may be in the video since I don't see where the content providers would be obtaining relevant contemporary data from any source in China except for maybe WHO which has credibility issues too.

Tony is not a virologist, he normally concentrates on economic policy, financial news, and political developments. Throughout the video he provides caveats about his sources and he clearly states when his observations are anecdotal. However, while Tony is not an expert on viruses, he is not going to ignore a current event. Calling him a hack reporter when he clearly has the skills to succeed in a variety of careers is unwarranted.