Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jfz9580m

(16,116 posts)
2. Bill Gates should go fuck himself
Thu Nov 13, 2025, 11:39 AM
Yesterday

Stupid old fart. He gushes about douchebags like these:

https://www.counterpunch.org/2024/07/26/the-unbearable-anthropocentrism-of-our-world-in-data/

For obvious reasons, Roser’s cheerful view of capitalist business-as-usual – and the data that would seem to support it – has made him a darling of libertarian market fundamentalists, who have lavished praise on his work. His admirers include some of the most extreme right wing think tanks in the U.S. and U.K. Among these are the Cato Institute, spawn of the noxious fossil fuel magnates Charles and David Koch; the American Enterprise Institute, best known for its spreading of lies to foment the US-Iraq War in 2003; the Foundation for Economic Education, the oldest libertarian think tank in the U.S., founded by business interests to peddle pro-market, antigovernment ideology; and the Institute of Economic Affairs, a U.K.-based organization that has promoted climate-change denial.

Roser’s most important supporter, providing hundreds of thousands of dollars in funding, is the world’s fifth richest man, Bill Gates. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has been the single largest donor in recent years, funding “general operations and data infrastructure development” along with “core project activities.” Gates and Roser know each other personally. Gates has referred to OWID as his “favorite website.”

Other notable allies are the philosophers and social theorists who make up what’s called “effective altruism.” EA is a boutique ideology of wealthy elites who wish to do the “most good” in the world through charitable giving. Silicon Valley tech bros have been prominent devotees, including Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz and Estonian billionaire Jaan Taallin, developer of Skype.
According to the EA platform, pursuit of lucrative jobs within the profiteering framework is the ideal, as this provides more disposable income for donations to EA-approved charities. EA philosopher William MacAskill, who teaches at Oxford University, has advocated hiring on with “immoral organizations” if it increases income for ethical giving. Put another way: If maintaining an exploitative, unjust system means more profits for elites, then utility can be maximized, so long as elites practice some manner of “effective” and “altruistic” philanthropy. Philosopher Emile Torres, a one-time EA enthusiast and now postdoctoral researcher at Case Western Reserve University, says that the movement “ultimately reinforces the neoliberalism that is, in fact, a root cause of so many of our global problems.”



The noxious crap Gates and his ilk spew-the good billionaires! For 20 years now I have been hearing this bullshit Cato line that glorifies overpopulation, deregulated industrial overgrowth while peddling this sleazy, condescending faux concern for the poor. They focus on bogus things that will not affect the supply of cheap labor (essentially disposable humans to this ilk) while peddling these nauseating statistics Steven Pinker style.
“Everything is getting better! “
No it isn’t, you fugly dickhead!

Sorry..and I should ruefully note that I just said in some other thread that I would try to be measured or something. You know how it is hatrack ;-/…

Edit: Further, effective altruism is noxious.. it’s most objectionable part is that it piles on to animal rights and in the stupidest ways imaginable of course..That MacCaskill douchebag being a prime example. I hate that respectable non-profits I support like The Humane League have to take money or support where they can find it since they get such a small fraction of all philanthropy that they can’t turn their noses up at any support:

https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/qa-senterra-funders

Donations to reform and replace factory farming now total around roughly $260 million a year, which represents just 0.04 percent of global philanthropy and over 100 times less than causes like global development (around $70 billion) or climate change (around $60 billion). It’s remarkable what committed activists, campaigners, and organizers have accomplished for animals with such limited resources, but they need more to stand up against entrenched interests, especially (unfortunately) in politics.


Still animal rights non profits are exceptionally good at stretching money a long way and that I guess attracts these morons.. .
And factory farming is of course itself a major driver of climate change and other environmental issues, horrifying cruelty aside.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»From "Dulled Acceptance" ...»Reply #2