Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

John ONeill

(79 posts)
4. Finland
Mon Sep 29, 2025, 05:51 AM
Yesterday

New study from LUT university in Finland about how much cheaper they can decarbonise with wind and solar, than with more nuclear (already at 38% of their power.) Apparently, according to their apologist on ex-Twitter, they'd need just as much new transmission for nuclear as for wind and solar. When I pointed out that the country only averages 3 hours sunlight per day all winter, he goes 'we balance with biomass.' Me - Finnish biomass is 230 grams CO2/kW hour, Finnish nuclear 5 g.
https://t.co/ze3B6dSe1E
A previous work by Mark Jacobson on the wonderful prospects for '100% WindWaterSolar' in Finland got a local response
https://passiiviidentiteetti.wordpress.com/2016/01/02/part-1-why-does-mark-jacobson-hate-finland/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Copper Cannot Be Mined Fa...»Reply #4