Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MrWowWow

(890 posts)
1. This Shit Would Not Be a Problem With Alkaline Fuel Cells
Fri Aug 22, 2025, 06:10 PM
Friday

Last edited Sat Aug 23, 2025, 12:23 PM - Edit history (3)

That's a fact Jack!


Alkaline fuel cells (AFCs) typically use much less platinum catalyst than proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells


Typical catalyst loading

PEMFCs: usually require 0.2–0.4 mg Pt/cm² (sometimes higher in older designs).

AFCs: can run at 0–0.05 mg Pt/cm², or even eliminate platinum entirely if using silver or transition-metal oxides as catalysts.


3. Cost implication

This difference in platinum loading makes AFCs significantly cheaper from a materials standpoint, since platinum is one of the biggest cost drivers in PEM fuel cells.


for the same power and H₂ input, expect:

Stack BOM: alkaline ~0.7–0.8× PEM.

System BOM: alkaline ~0.8–0.9× PEM (application- and lifetime-dependent).

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Unable to Afford Platinum...»Reply #1