Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(21,641 posts)
2. You're absolutely correct. We should stop doing all basic research.
Thu Aug 21, 2025, 05:15 PM
Thursday

Well, except into nuclear power of course, because that will save us! Right?

If all primary energy is derived from nuclear power, some form of energy storage (e.g. batteries, hydrogen, "pumped hydro") would be really, really useful. Nuclear plants are most efficient/cost effective, when producing at a constant rate. How do you get that constant rate to meet fluctuating demand? Build more plants! Right?

Nuclear power plants are not easily transportable, say, to power a car, or a bus or a cellphone. Even if our grid were entirely powered by nuclear power (which it won’t be, get over it) that would not address the majority of emissions.

https://www.gen-4.org/resources/reports/system-analysis-hydrogen-production-nuclear-energy



The decarbonisation of electricity generation alone is insufficient to meet the challenging CO₂ emission reduction targets. Emissions from the industrial and the transportation sectors are higher than the electricity sector…

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Breaking the Rules to Bui...»Reply #2