Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(36,427 posts)
14. Actually, I intended this post for another thread but...
Tue Aug 19, 2025, 09:04 AM
Aug 19

...let me guess, you want to say the data a Mauna Loa is wrong?

I fully understand that most "renewable energy will save us" types are uninterested entirely in the data connected with the collapse of the planetary atmosphere and thus have no experience with the data published there. I am well aware as well of the contempt for science, but as a person working in analytical chemistry, I can also say that the procedures utilized in compiling this data are available on the website and are beautiful to read, rigorous with a discussion, as analytical chemistry should have, of instrumentation, analytical blanks, accuracy, precision, and data processing. It will be a terrible event if the orange pedophile, his contempt for science exceeding even that of the antinukes around here, shuts the facility down.

It is not as if reducing, for a period of 50 to 60 weeks, slightly, energy demand, is going to suck carbon dioxide out of the air. However if one opens the page, one can also see the data for increases in the concentration of carbon dioxide for every year going back to 1960, which is not to say that antinukes are remotely interested in these numbers. In 2022 that increase was 1.83 ppm for the yearly average, 2021, 2.34 ppm and 2020 2.30 ppm, compared to 3.36 ppm for 2023, and 3.33 ppm for 2024. A bar graph is available at the site for the people who can't read very well.

2023 and 2024 set records for the worst and second worst years ever.

I seem to recall that Covid did not result in the shutdown of all the planet's power plants and gas stations. Did I miss that?

We are trillions of dollars into the solar/wind/electric car miracle advertised here as "the energy transition" that people carry on endlessly about.

In my opinion, "the energy transition" has less of a reality than, say, the Easter Bunny. The evidence for the Easter Bunny is that when my kids were small Easter baskets used to show up filled with candy, although I concede my wife may have had something to do with that. The evidence for an "energy transition" by contrast is not evident from the high quality scientific data available at Mauna Loa for concentrations of carbon dioxide in the planetary atmosphere.

Have a nice day.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

imagine having all that time on your hands and choosing to do THAT Skittles Aug 17 #1
Reprehensible piece of crap ...hurting everyone with her stupidity and arrogance JT45242 Aug 17 #2
So called "renewable energy" has nothing to do with fighting greenhouse gases. NNadir Aug 17 #4
While I know this won't be happily received here, I applaud her efforts to protect wilderness from development. NNadir Aug 17 #3
Renewable energy is seeing massive growth that nuclear cannot hope to compete with. VMA131Marine Aug 17 #5
It would be useful, if one were to actually believe this nonsense, to look at the Mauna Loa CO2 observatory data. NNadir Aug 18 #9
Where is COVID in the Mauna Loa data? Finishline42 Aug 18 #10
Actually, I intended this post for another thread but... NNadir Aug 19 #14
let me guess, you want to say the data a Mauna Loa is wrong? Finishline42 Aug 20 #19
Don't worry. Be happy. I hear all the time that solar and wind will save us. By the way, my lights went on and... NNadir Aug 20 #20
How fast could we build nuclear power plants? VMA131Marine Aug 19 #15
It actually would require something called "numbers" to dispose of this absurd argument. NNadir Aug 19 #16
I notice you didn't answer my question! VMA131Marine Aug 19 #17
I interpret my response quite differently. I don't regard numbers as Gish Gallop, but I am well aware that... NNadir Aug 20 #18
We're not going to save the world by trashing it. hunter Aug 17 #6
you've done your own research Skittles Aug 17 #8
Well it is a little more complicated jfz9580m Aug 18 #11
NNadir's post on Levelized Full System Costs of Electricity is a good one. hunter Aug 18 #12
Can't live forever. rickyhall Aug 17 #7
Here's a direct link without the social media tracking: hunter Aug 19 #13
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»How One Woman Is Stalling...»Reply #14