Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

NNadir

(36,419 posts)

4. So called "renewable energy" has nothing to do with fighting greenhouse gases.

Reply to JT45242 (Reply #2)

Sun Aug 17, 2025, 09:15 PM

Aug 17

We've spent trillions on solar and wind in this century with the result the concentration of fossil fuel waste in the planetary atmosphere, chiefly but not limited to carbon dioxide, is climbing at an accelerating pace.

The purpose of the reactionary effort to return to dependence of energy sources on the weather - abandoned beginning in the 19th century for a reason was to attack the only sustainable and scalable form of climate change energy that is available to humanity, nuclear energy.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How One Woman Is Stalling Green Energy Projects in Oregon [View all] mahatmakanejeeves Aug 17 OP

imagine having all that time on your hands and choosing to do THAT Skittles Aug 17 #1

Reprehensible piece of crap ...hurting everyone with her stupidity and arrogance JT45242 Aug 17 #2

So called "renewable energy" has nothing to do with fighting greenhouse gases. NNadir Aug 17 #4

While I know this won't be happily received here, I applaud her efforts to protect wilderness from development. NNadir Aug 17 #3

Renewable energy is seeing massive growth that nuclear cannot hope to compete with. VMA131Marine Aug 17 #5

It would be useful, if one were to actually believe this nonsense, to look at the Mauna Loa CO2 observatory data. NNadir Aug 18 #9

Where is COVID in the Mauna Loa data? Finishline42 Aug 18 #10

Actually, I intended this post for another thread but... NNadir Aug 19 #14

let me guess, you want to say the data a Mauna Loa is wrong? Finishline42 Aug 20 #19

Don't worry. Be happy. I hear all the time that solar and wind will save us. By the way, my lights went on and... NNadir Aug 20 #20

How fast could we build nuclear power plants? VMA131Marine Aug 19 #15

It actually would require something called "numbers" to dispose of this absurd argument. NNadir Aug 19 #16

I notice you didn't answer my question! VMA131Marine Aug 19 #17

I interpret my response quite differently. I don't regard numbers as Gish Gallop, but I am well aware that... NNadir Aug 20 #18

We're not going to save the world by trashing it. hunter Aug 17 #6

you've done your own research Skittles Aug 17 #8

Well it is a little more complicated jfz9580m Aug 18 #11

NNadir's post on Levelized Full System Costs of Electricity is a good one. hunter Aug 18 #12

Can't live forever. rickyhall Aug 17 #7

Here's a direct link without the social media tracking: hunter Aug 19 #13