Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

thought crime

(497 posts)
7. In my experience, most people advocating alternative energy are not defending the indefensible.
Sat Jun 7, 2025, 09:41 AM
Jun 7

I prefer wind/solar because it does not produce fossil fuel toxins/carbon or radioactive waste, and is economically viable, now.

I would not call myself an "anti-nuke", but I do know there is a record of mismanagement of radioactive material. Very strict regulation is necessary at every step of the cycle, and that drives cost. Relaxing regulation increases the probability of contamination.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Hydrogen cars 'are not th...»Reply #7