Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progree

(12,103 posts)
2. When I take an RMD, I just transfer it to another "market based so called savings plan"
Sat Dec 12, 2020, 02:42 PM
Dec 2020

though I consider both of them to be quite real. (Yes, and I have to pay taxes on the RMD withdrawal/transfer). I never consider taking an RMD to be some kind of mandate to go spend it.

This Legislation is all about you and I not taking our money out of the Markets . All those market based so called savings plans total in the Trillions.


from the OP:
The argument for an age restriction – which is noted in an official summary of the bill – is “to ensure that individuals spend their retirement savings during their lifetime and not use their retirement plans for estate planning purposes to transfer wealth to beneficiaries.”


Nope, it doesn't ensure that I spend it in my lifetime. I wonder what complete and total idiot wrote that into the bill. A requirement to take RMDs does not impact my spending in the least, at least not in the short-term (though my net worth is reduced by paying the taxes on the RMD withdrawal, so ultimately it could actually reduce my spending over time).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Personal Finance and Investing»Congress looking to chang...»Reply #2